Neil,
> There are a lot of people waiting on this upstream release, a lot of
> other tasks outside Debian. The upstream release can't wait for this
> Debian bug to be fixed […]
[…]
> A rushed fix to the current postinst is simply unacceptable.
I'm lost, sorry.. None of these prevents you uploadi
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:33:54 +0100
Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 895597 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> > From the tag description (extended in bug #889489), it's not clear
> > to me *how* to use runuser for the requested fix and *why* using
> > runuser actually fixes the problem described in t
tags 895597 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Neil,
> From the tag description (extended in bug #889489), it's not clear to me
> *how* to use runuser for the requested fix and *why* using runuser
> actually fixes the problem described in the tag
I can't comment on this directly, but the tag was also extended
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 895597 + moreinfo
Bug #895597 [lintian] lintian: Please improve advice on fixing
maintainer-script-should-not-use-recursive-chown-or-chmod
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.82
Severity: wishlist
>From the tag description (extended in bug #889489), it's not clear to me
*how* to use runuser for the requested fix and *why* using runuser
actually fixes the problem described in the tag and the referenced
bug reports. (The bugs referenced in t
5 matches
Mail list logo