Bug#914562: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

2018-11-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Chris Lamb dixit: >I believe Lintian should treat dep.debian.net as the canonical >acronymisation at this point and adopt that. If there is a >consensus and enough hunger for this to change "upstream" then >Lintian will very adopt to it. > >In that light, I've (at least) made it consistent here:

Bug#914562: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

2018-11-25 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 914562 + pending thanks Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Personally I’d prefer DEP-3, but the http://dep.debian.net/ site > uses “DEP 3” spelling (with ASCII space in between), except in > the URLs which have “dep3”. I believe Lintian should treat dep.debian.net as the canonical acronymisation at

Bug#914562: lintian: please decide on Debian Enhancement Proposal spelling (harmonise)

2018-11-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.112 Severity: wishlist I found this: /usr/share/lintian/checks/patch-systems.desc:Info: The patch contains a standard DEP-3 template description vs. /usr/share/lintian/checks/upstream-metadata.desc:Info: The DEP 12 metadata file in the source is not readable.