with Policy, so this is tricky.)
I'd check with the d-i team and ask them their opinion. I'm happy to
modify lintian to match if needed.
With my d-i hat on, I would certainly recommend not including the
Homepage field in udebs. It's not actually forbidden as such, but any
waste of space in udebs
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 10:30 +, Colin Watson wrote:
With my d-i hat on, I would certainly recommend not including the
Homepage field in udebs. It's not actually forbidden as such, but any
waste of space in udebs is frowned upon.
I thought as much.
I expect you could work around
Hi all,
I'm sponsoring ttf-khmeros, which produces a font udeb for d-i. The
latest ttf-khmeros update moved the homepage from the package
description to the new dpkg source package field. As a result, lintian
complains with I: ttf-khmeros-udeb udeb: unknown-field-in-control
homepage. Is this a
Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sponsoring ttf-khmeros, which produces a font udeb for d-i. The
latest ttf-khmeros update moved the homepage from the package
description to the new dpkg source package field. As a result, lintian
complains with I: ttf-khmeros-udeb udeb:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:59 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'd check with the d-i team and ask them their opinion. I'm happy to
modify lintian to match if needed.
Thanks for that.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
5 matches
Mail list logo