Re: Scheduling 9.9
On 15351 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: - April 27 Wfm. -- bye, Joerg
Re: Scheduling 9.7
On 15286 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: - Feb 9 - Feb 16 Can deal with both. -- bye, Joerg
Re: Scheduling 9.5
On 15077 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> - July 7th >> - July 14th >> Are people available for either or both of those dates? > The 7th is looking like the favourite so far (although would mean > freezing next weekend), but we still need an ftp-master (N)ACK on > either / both date. No way for me for both, sorry. -- bye, Joerg
Re: Scheduling 9.5
On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big > ask) No. > - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM) Possible. > - Jun 9th (getting quite a way out of cadence, but maybe that can't be >helped) Possible. -- bye, Joerg
Re: Scheduling final Jessie point release, 8.11
On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > - 23rd Jun Ok. > - 7th July No. -- bye, Joerg
Re: Scheduling 9.4
On 14944 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: > we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4. > Can you please let us know your availability on the following: > - March 3 > - March 10 Can do. > - March 17 Not very good > - March 24 > - March 31 No way. -- bye, Joerg
Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9
On 14714 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July Both of them don't work for me. > 22/23 July That I could do. -- bye, Joerg
Re: 8.8 planning
On 14611 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: > * April 8-9 No > * April 15-16 Possible > * April 22-23 Ok > * April 29-30 Ok > * May 6-7 No. -- bye, Joerg
Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning
On 14307 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same Saturday again. > June 4th/5th > June 11th/12th > June 18th/19th > June 25th/26th All work for me. -- bye, Joerg Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind. -- Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man
Re: Bug#804315: [Vmdebootstrap-devel] Namespace issues
On 14120 March 1977, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an > external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is > something that needs to be fixed. It is worth noting that you do not declare such things. Such an attitude is just plain wrong. It is as official a package in Debian as any other, and we have been respectful with namespaces on replacing them. At a minimum people got approached before. > I'm aware that I'm going to be upsetting people, but this has been a long > time coming and I'm not going to spend time bikeshedding over naming. As an ftpmaster I can tell you that you will have to spend more time on bikeshedding over the name. live-build-ng wont fly. > I would rather spend that time on integration of live image creation > into official Debian infrastructure and building the best system for > live image creation possible. You would have spent WAY less time on this if you wouldn't have started out entirely negative here. -- bye, Joerg Siliziumdioxid wird auf offenen LKWs durch Deutschland gefahren! Der Sauerstoffgehalt der Atmosphaere ist auf 21% gesunken!
Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning
On 14037 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon 19th/20th - looks okay 26th/27th - looks okay All dates do seem to work for me currently, assuming the ftpmaster foo is done on Saturday (one right after the other?!), otherwise the 13th won't work out. On the 5th I would be available only about 2 hours later than usual starting times. -- bye, Joerg Oh, so they have internet on computers now!
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On 13951 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later? I was assuming either 8ish UTC (skipping dinstall) or 10ish UTC (after dinstall). Either would work for me, I'll just need more coffee for the former. :-) I've put 12 to 14 (so 10 to 12 UTC) in my calendar. -- bye, Joerg I think Smithers picked me because of my motivational skills. Everyone says they have to work a lot harder when I'm around. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87egm4n7zl@gkar.ganneff.de
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu opu stable. Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later? -- bye, Joerg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87vbfmz7lk@delenn.ganneff.de
Re: Scheduling for 7.3
According to the normal schedule, the point release for 7.3 is due somewhere around 12th December. How does everybody look for the weekends of: 14th/5th 21st/22nd 28th/29th December? Based on the responses so far, if we want to be sure to have an ftpmaster, SRM and CD-master available then it looks like the 14th might be the best bet. I put it in my calendar for the 14th now, so should be available then. -- bye, Joerg From a NM after doing the license stuff: I am glad that I am not a lawyer! What a miserable way to earn a living. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878uw33pz6@gkar.ganneff.de
Re: Wheezy point release planning
On 13209 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16 June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point release. Would that work for everyone? I'll be away then, with a TZ=UTC+8 and not very good net connection. So I'm basically out of it, hope Ansgar/Mark can jump in and do it. -- bye, Joerg I'm having the best day of my life, and I owe it all to not going to Church! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87li7j8kmw@gkar.ganneff.de
