Re: Starting the weekly live images for Bookworm building again
Hello Debian Live and Debian Publicity teams Note: not subscribed to debian-live, subscribed to debian-publicity It's great news that the weekly live images for Bookworm are available again! Thanks everybody for the work (I know it's going on but this is a nice milestone). I have no spoons to do it myself, but if anybody could write up a summary of the thread/work, with links for people to download and test, and pointers to the Debian Live team on how to help/submit feedback, that would be great. If there is a volunteer to do it, please reply to this mail in -publicity mailing list, and go ahead: start a pad in storm.debian.net or directly commit a draft in https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/bits/-/tree/master/content/2023 - I'm happy to review text, just not able right now to start from scratch. If nobody can do this (let's say, no replies to this mail in one week), I can micronews the message https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2023/03/msg00026.html next Friday, so at least our wide audience gets the news and the pointer to the debian-list mailing list to follow-up. Kind regards, -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: Scheduling 9.6
Hi El 9/10/18 a las 9:07, Cyril Brulebois escribió: Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2018-10-06): That didn't work out so well in the end, and in the meantime we rather let the ball drop. :-( In the interests of getting things moving, some more current suggestions: - October 20th (means freezing next weekend) - October 27th - November 3rd - November 10th All of these look good to me. The first one is a bit close (esp. with my backlog, as you pointed out a few days ago), but that should be doable. All of them ok for press/publicity too. Cheers -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: Scheduling 9.5
El 12 de junio de 2018 13:44:52 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" escribió: >On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> [Cc += debian-kernel] >> >> On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >>> On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >[...] >> We're past any of the above by now, and while looking through the >to-do >> list for the final jessie point release, I noticed that we currently >> have some packages in opu with versions higher than stable. >> >> We can either accept the packages and put up with the situation for a >> short while, or do 9.5 before 8.11. In practical terms, that would >> likely mean both 9.5 and 8.11 on June 23rd, freezing both next >weekend. >> How do people feel about that? > >After discussions on IRC, it appears unlikely that the currently WIP >kernel update will be ready in sufficient time to be happy with it on >all architectures. > >So the possible options are: > >- go ahead with freezing 9.5 this weekend, and hope the kernel's ready >in time >- go ahead with freezing 9.5 this weekend, and update the kernel via >stable-updates later >- just do 8.11 this weekend, accept the version skew and get 9.5 >released as soon as we can > >To be entirely honest, I'm not that comfortable with announcing a >freeze >this close to the actual date. In terms of packages with version skew, >we have: > >- packages from the security archive, where users upgrading should >already have the jessie-security package installed in any case >- intel-microcode, src:patch and clamav, where it looks like the jessie > >package should work on stretch without issues >- tzdata, which is already available from stretch-updates. > >Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate on >getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 sorted. > >For suggested dates for 9.5, we know that June 30th is a no-go, Debcamp > >starts on July 21st and then Debconf on the 28th. So that leaves us >with: > >- July 7th This we (publicity) can, and prefer it. >- July 14th This, could be possible, but only one of us is available. Cheers -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona Sent with K-9 mail
Re: Scheduling 9.5
Hello Sorry for the delay in answering El 14/05/18 a las 19:19, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió: > Hi, > > We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your availablility > out of: > > - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big ask) > - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM) > - Jun 9th (getting quite a way out of cadence, but maybe that can't be >helped) We (publicity) are available any of the above weekends. Thanks -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: Scheduling final Jessie point release, 8.11
Hello El 14/05/18 a las 19:26, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió: > Hi, > > According to my records main security support for Jessie can end any time > after 17th June. > > So to the security team: do you have a date in mind? > > I also presume that LTS will take over the existing security suites as > before. [1] lists the current delta between security and o-p-u-new which > would ideally be as short as possible before the EOL date. > > For everyone else, assuming it'll be soon after that date please > indicate your availability from: > > - 23rd Jun Publicity available > - (30th Jun I already know is impossible, for the sake of completeness) Publicity we can't > - 7th July > Publicity available. > or adjacent Sundays. > Sundays we are available, with some difficulty if we decide 1 July, but do-able. Thanks -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: Scheduling 9.4
Hi sorry for the delay answering El 14/02/18 a las 23:26, Joerg Jaspert escribió: > On 14944 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4. >> Can you please let us know your availability on the following: >> - March 3 >> - March 10 > > Can do. Publicity team is also available March 3 and 10. > >> - March 17 > > Not very good This we could make it too. Cheers > >> - March 24 >> - March 31 > > No way. > -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: Scheduling 9.3
Hi all El 15/11/17 a las 19:30, Steve McIntyre escribió: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 05:00:16PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >> On 2017-09-24 17:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Our target for 9.3 and 8.10 is the first weekend in December (this >>> happily >>> makes the following target the beginning of February, avoiding the >>> festive >>> season). >>> >>> Accordingly I'm looking at one of: >> [...] >>> 2nd December >>> 9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending >>> the cycle) >> Publicity team is available both weekends. Cheers -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: Scheduling 9.2
Hello El 27/08/17 a las 17:48, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió: > Hi, > > I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for around > 23rd September. How about one of: > > 23rd/24th September > 30th Septmber/1st October > > [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] > > After discussion with Adam and Steve, we felt it made sense to work on 2 > months for stable and 4 months for oldstable; that way there isn't a month > 3 to try and fit in betweens. So every other stable update will also be an > oldstable. > > Thanks, > Please choose the date that suits better and at least one member of publicity team will be around for the announcement. Cheers -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Re: 8.8 planning
Hi El 14/03/17 a las 12:00, Julien Cristau escribió: > It's time to start thinking about our next stable point release. Here > are some dates, please let us know which ones would work. > > * April 8-9 > * April 15-16 Not sure, but could be > * April 22-23 > * April 29-30 > * May 6-7 Those, at least two people from publicity are available. > > I know at least Adam can't do 15-16 so that one is most likely out anyway. > > Cheers, > Julien > Cheers -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
