Re: Bug#692111: wrong contents files in place (breaks firmware package selection in live-build)

Control: noowner -1 On 11/02/2012 11:39 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Owner: debian-live@lists.debian.org "The owner of a bug claims responsibility for fixing it."[1] I don't think you mean this. [1] > It used to be that dists/$codename/Contents

Re: Bug#692111: wrong contents files in place (breaks firmware package selection in live-build)

Daniel Baumann writes: > On 11/02/2012 12:11 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> I think this was changed in b36379705f3f2a52788ad19cf1da339c4edf339d >> back in March 2011 and announced in [2]. Note that the compatibility >> symlinks will be removed once squeeze moved to archive.

Re: Scheduling 9.2

Jonathan Wiltshire writes: > Ok, does 7th October work any better? I'm keen not to get too far adrift > from the interval though. Should be okay if no other ftpmaster volunteers. Ansgar

Re: Scheduling 9.3

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 08:02 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I believe we still need ftp-master and press confirmation, but I've > been failing at poking. Either of 2017-12-02 or 2017-12-09 should be fine for me. Ansgar

Re: Scheduling 9.4

On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 12:27 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4. > > Can you please let us know your availability on the following: > - March 3 > - March 10 These don't work for me. > - March 17 > - March 24 > - March 31 These might wor

Re: Scheduling 9.5

On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 18:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > We can either accept the packages and put up with the situation for a > short while, or do 9.5 before 8.11. In practical terms, that would > likely mean both 9.5 and 8.11 on June 23rd, freezing both next > weekend. Should be fine with me;

Re: Scheduling 9.5

Hi, On Sat, 2018-06-23 at 17:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 12:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate > > on getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 > > sorted. > > > > For sugg

Re: Scheduling 9.6

Hi, "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > - November 10th This would work if needed, though I don't mind someone else doing the archive side (still have some things to sort out *sigh*). Ansgar

Re: Wheezy point release planning

On 05/12/2013 20:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16 > June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point release. Would > that work for everyone? I can do the ftpmaster side. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-re

Re: Scheduling 7.4 and 6.0.9

Hi, On 01/08/2014 06:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > How are people fixed for: > > 8th / 9th February > 15th / 16th February > 22nd / 23rd February > 1st / 2nd March I'm still free on all dates. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Scheduling the 7.5 point release

Hi, On 03/01/2014 21:44, Niels Thykier wrote: > We are slowly starting to prepare for the 7.5 point release and are > suggesting one of the four following weekends: > > * April 12th/13th > * April 19th/20th (Easter) > * April 26th/27th > * May 3rd/4th I don't have any particular plans on eit

Re: Scheduling the 7.5 point release

On 04/21/2014 19:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 23:03 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 09:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 21:44 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: We are slowly starting to prepare for the 7.5 point release and are >

Re: 7.6 and 6.0.10

Hi, "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > (Somewhat belatedly) it's time to organise the next point releases for > Wheezy and Squeeze (7.6 and 6.0.10). [...] > Giving ourselves the usual pre-window to get organised, some suggested > dates would be: > > - June 28/29 > - July 5/6 > - July 12/13 > - July 19/2

Re: 7.7 planning

Hi, "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose > we go for one of: > > 11/12 October > 18/19 October > 25/26 October All of these are still good for me. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some > potential September dates: > > 5/6th - okay for me Should be okay, provided I get internet on Aug 31st as planned. > 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon > 19th/20th

Re: 8.3 planning

On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 17:22 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 16:10 -0500, Donald Norwood wrote: > > On 12/04/2015 01:12 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:43:54PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: > > > > On that basis, looking at January we have: > > > > > >

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing > both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD > team seem happy to try it again. > > Some suggested dates: > > March 12th / 13th > March 19th / 20th > April 2nd / 3rd These

Re: 8.6 planning

On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 23:04 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It's time for another Jessie point release; as wheezy's EOL, we don't > have to worry about trying to fit two in at the same time. Some > possible > dates: > > August 20th/21st - doesn't work for me > > August 27th/28th - public holiday

Re: 8.8 planning

On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 12:00 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > It's time to start thinking about our next stable point > release.  Here > are some dates, please let us know which ones would work. > > * April 8-9 Not ideal, but should work. > * April 15-16 Only on 16th. > * April 22-23 > * April 29