Re: Any ideas on whether or not a Wheezy LTS will happen or not

2015-03-29 Thread Jeremy Davis
Thanks for your response Michael, On 30/03/15 10:39, Michael Banck wrote: > Please keep in mind that wheezy will get regular maintenance for one > year after the jessie release, so the question whether there will be a > wheezy-lts or not is not imminent. I understand that there will be no final a

Re: Any ideas on whether or not a Wheezy LTS will happen or not

2015-03-29 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:25:45AM +1100, Jeremy Davis wrote: > I hope that this is an appropriate place to post this... If not please > suggest a better place. I guess the debian-lts list would be more appropriate, and as you made a smaller post there as well, I CC'd it. > I work with TurnKey L

Any ideas on possibility of wheezy-lts?

2015-03-29 Thread Jeremy Davis
Hi, I have googled high and low and got no recent comment/thoughts/etc on whether or not there is even consideration of a Wheezy LTS. I understand that it would be dependant on the success (or not) of Squeeze-LTS but I could not find any (even preliminary) evaluation on that. TBH I couldn't even

Re: Query about possible bug fix involving security issues for web browsers

2015-03-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 14:11 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > Hello. > > As the named project leader for the rekonq project, has made it clear > that rekonq for Debian 6 and Debian 7, is no longer supported, and a > persistent bug has been shown in the version of rekonq for Debian 6, I > am wondering whe