Re: Missing DLA mail for DLA-378-1 (linux-2.6)?

On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:58 +, Michael Howe wrote: > Hello, > > linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze18 appeared in the archives a couple of days > back, and I see from DLA/list that DLA-378-1 was reserved by Ben > Hutchings, but there doesn't seem to have been an email to > debian-lts-announce about

Missing DLA mail for DLA-378-1 (linux-2.6)?

Hello, linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze18 appeared in the archives a couple of days back, and I see from DLA/list that DLA-378-1 was reserved by Ben Hutchings, but there doesn't seem to have been an email to debian-lts-announce about it. Could a mail be sent if it hasn't been, or unstuck from wherever

[SECURITY] [DLA 378-1] linux-2.6 security update

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-48squeeze18 CVE ID : CVE-2015-7550 CVE-2015-8543 CVE-2015-8575 Debian Bug : #808293 This update fixes the CVEs described below. CVE-2015-7550 Dmitry Vyukov discovered a race condition in the keyring subsystem that allows a

Re: Accepted cacti 0.8.7g-1+squeeze9+deb6u13 (source all) into squeeze-lts

Hi Chris, On 05-01-16 00:23, Chris Lamb wrote: >> To be honest, I would have expected you would have shared your fix >> somewhere, e.g. also in a regular bug against cacti such that the >> (old)stable releases could more easily see/use the patch. > > I will happily add it too your bug tracker

Re: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze18 (all source) into squeeze-lts

Hi, On Tue, 05 Jan 2016, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > W: GPG error: http://http.debian.net squeeze-lts Release: The following > signatures were invalid: BADSIG 8B48AD6246925553 Debian Archive Automatic > Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) So that message is not specific to any

another squeeze cacti update?

Hi! Cacti still shows up in the list of opened issues in squeeze... Are you going to take care of CVE-2015-8604 next? Thanks! a. -- The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the