Re: Security update of firefox-esr for Wheezy

On 07/08/16 22:17, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 07 Aug 2016, Guido Günther wrote: >> I too think I would be good to support Firefox & Icedove until Wheezy >> goes EOL. Wd could backport gcc 4.8 from Jessie with only C/C++ enabled. > > And obviously, we make no change to gcc-defaults. > >

Re: Security update of firefox-esr for Wheezy

Hi Yes I think it is a good idea to mark it as unsupported as you describe. // Ola On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 07 Aug 2016, Guido Günther wrote: > > I too think I would be good to support Firefox & Icedove until Wheezy > > goes EOL. Wd

Re: Security update of nettle

Hi Andreas It looks like you have managed without the context. I'm sorry that I was a little too brief. First thank you a lot for confirming that gnutls do not use nettle in wheezy. This is very good to know as I can safely patch nettle without considering gnutls usage of nettle. Thanks! It

Re: Wheezy update of mupdf?

Dear maintainer, dear LTS team, Am 06.08.2016 um 15:59 schrieb Jonas Meurer: > the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > currently open in the Wheezy version of mupdf: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-6525 > [...] > > PS: I already started

Re: Security update of firefox-esr for Wheezy

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:52:29PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 04/08/16 23:02, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 07:50:28PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > >> Hi, > >> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:32:14PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > >>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:04:47AM

Re: Security update of nettle

On 2016-08-07 Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Niels Möller wrote: >> Ola Lundqvist writes: >>> Magnus, Niels and I have been discussing the nettle update due to >>>