Re: Security update of firefox-esr for Wheezy

On 08/08/16 10:20, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Shall we mark gcc-4.8 as unsupported in wheezy, explaining that its only >>> purpose is to enable build of other packages? >> >> That would make sense. >> >> I'll see if I can take a look at this. >

Re: Wheezy update of mailman?

Hi Thijs, > > the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > > currently open in the Wheezy version of mailman: > > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-6893 > > I'll look into it and will let you know. Any progress on this? I have prepared an update for

Wheezy update of mactelnet?

Hello Håkon, the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of mactelnet: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/mactelnet Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have

Re: matrixssl

Hi Brian, On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:41:19PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > Guido Günther writes: > > > There are exploits mentioned in the paper. I think we should test them > > before releasing a DLA. > > What paper are you referring to here? > > There is the blog post here: >

Re: August Report

Hi Brian I had the same issue a month ago. It solved itself after a few days when new issues were found. // Ola On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Brian May wrote: > Hello, > > Just wondering how I should spend my LTS hours. If I look at the list of > unclaimed packages for LTS: