On Tue 2018-11-20 15:47:00 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 10:28 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2018-11-20 15:19:45, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:48 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> [...]
>> > > I think this is overengineered. I still haven't heard exac
Hi,
El 20/11/18 a las 16:17, Holger Levsen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:50:16PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > Automatic unclaimer
> > ---
> >
> > After an internal discussion about work procedures, a friend pointed me
> > at the [don't lick the cookie][6] ar
Hi Hugo,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:46:21PM +0100, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> > -libav (Hugo Lefeuvre)
> > +libav
> > AFAICS this is a legit unclaim. Hugo, would you mind to unclaim this?
> I don't mind. This is probably the best thing to do.
ok, done, thanks. And: feel free to reclaim this package a
Hi Holger,
> So I ran it asking it to unclaim packages which didnt see activity in
> dla-needed.txt for more than 3 weeks. These are the results from running
> ./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 1814400
>
> -libav (Hugo Lefeuvre)
> +libav
> last NOTE: 20180529: Just contacted some of the
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:50:16PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Automatic unclaimer
> ---
>
> After an internal discussion about work procedures, a friend pointed me
> at the [don't lick the cookie][6] article which I found really
> interesting. The basic idea is that our p
Hi Thorsten,
Am 19.11.18 um 20:04 schrieb Thorsten Alteholz:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I uploaded version 1.0.1t-1+deb8u10 of openssl to:
>
> https://people.debian.org/~alteholz/packages/jessie-lts/openssl/
>
> Please give it a try and tell me about any problems you met.
[...]
I will test it tomorr
hi,
this reply is mostly about using the tool itself, see below. I will now write
another mail about the results from using it...
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:50:16PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Automatic unclaimer
> ---
>
> After an internal discussion about work procedures, a
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 10:28 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-11-20 15:19:45, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:48 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
[...]
> > > I think this is overengineered. I still haven't heard exactly what the
> > > problem would be with upgrading those libra
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:07:26PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> The process broke down a while back, and reasons don't matter. We need
> to figure out how to fix this.
>
> So I opened #859122 to import the missing DLAs and I've made good
> progress.
>
> But I've opened this bug report (#859123
On 2018-11-20 15:19:45, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:48 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2018-11-13 22:02:45, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 12:31 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> > > On Mon 2018-11-12 15:16:39 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:48 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-11-13 22:02:45, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 12:31 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > > On Mon 2018-11-12 15:16:39 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > >
> > > > * libgcrypt20 (part of GnuTLS, 1.6 -> 1.7)
> > >
Hi Ola,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 10:30:16PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > What I did was to check CVE-2016-10729 and my conclusion that I cannot
> > > reproduce the problem.
> > can you reproduce the bug in sid or stretch?
> I have not tried, but I doubt I will succeed. I think the same securit
12 matches
Mail list logo
