On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 08:34:57AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > for jessie, there's no need to go via SRM, *we* are maintaining jessie > > now. > I understand that. My wording above was awkward, but it was intended to > make a distinction that I could just go ahead with the jessie upload at > any point.
ah! > > for stretch (and buster) I'm pondering whether we should do another > > upload to unstable first, as I did a commit yesterday marking chromium > > as unsupported in stretch. so I've come to conclude that I'll upload > > this right away (it will just delay buster migration by a day) as this > > change is pretty good to have for stretch. > Oh, OK. Please go ahead. ok, will do. > > so debsnap is buggy? > I think it just reflects that the packages which were uploaded differ > from the corresponding tags in the repository. ah :/ > Since it sounds like you have another updated past mine, would you be > willing to take over from here? yes. > I have attached my draft DLA text so that you can add the chromium bit > to it. Also, feel free to edit my draft text for clarity, consistency, > etc. thank you for your work so far & will do! -- cheers, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature