Abhijith PA writes:
> I generated DLA for jupyter-notebook just before upload. But upload was
> rejected due to `Built-Using refers to non-existing source package`. I have
> pinged ftp masters couple of times to manually move needed packages to
> security-master. If any ftp masters here, please h
Version: 1:2.09-1+2020d+1
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:35:02AM +, Ben Smithurst wrote:
>...
> Loaded DateTime::TimeZone::Europe::London, which is from a different version
> (2020d) of the Olson database than this installation of DateTime::TimeZone
> (2019c).
>...
Apologies for the breakage, I
Hi Matus,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:01 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> I have submitted a bug, containing fix for this issue:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974926
>
> I'm not sure if anyone is willing to fix this in the stretch version, but if
> it's the case, here you ar
Hello,
a graph zooming bug appeared in cacti ~2 months ago.
The bug appears in cacti 0.8 in stretch, it's fixed in buster.
I have submitted a bug, containing fix for this issue:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974926
I'm not sure if anyone is willing to fix this in the stretc
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:29:05PM +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> are you aware of this regression in stretch-security, can you fix this
> soonish (it leaves several hundred lines in my log every hour) and/or
> leave a comment in the bug?
Yes, I've seen the bug and already loo
Hi Adrian,
are you aware of this regression in stretch-security, can you fix this
soonish (it leaves several hundred lines in my log every hour) and/or
leave a comment in the bug?
thanks,
Florian
- Forwarded message from Ben Smithurst -
From: Ben Smithurst
To: Debian Bug Tracking Syst
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:35:02 +, Ben Smithurst wrote:
> Package: libdatetime-timezone-perl
> Version: 1:2.09-1+2020d
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> There seems to be an internally inconsistency in this package in that
> the Olson versions defined in timezones are inconsistent:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:36:23PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> These used to include the DLA number. Maybe those could be back?
copy&paste&cut error on my side, sorry.
- DLA 2446-1 (10 Nov 2020) (moin)
- DLA 2432-1 (04 Nov 2020) (jupyter-notebook)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦
Hi,
On 16/11/20 5:06 pm, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi,
...
> fwiw the jupyter-notebook DLA is not in -announce either, so it's not just
> missing in the website.
I generated DLA for jupyter-notebook just before upload. But upload was
rejected due to `Built-Using refers to non-existing sourc
Hi,
On 16/11/2020 11:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
- (15 Nov 2020) (libvncserver)
- (10 Nov 2020) (moin)
- (04 Nov 2020) (jupyter-notebook)
These used to include the DLA number. Maybe those could be back?
fwiw the jupyter-no
hi,
today is a nice Monday:
- no packages were unclaimed for LTS.
- no packages were unclaimed for ELTS.
- noone claimed too many packages.
There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
- (15 Nov 2020) (libvncserver)
- (10 Nov 2020) (moin)
- (04 Nov 2020) (jupyter-note
11 matches
Mail list logo
