Re: Closing wheezy-security for newer uploads

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > Since wheezy is no longer LTS, please close it so that no new uploads can > happen > on wheezy-security on security-master. This can happen now even if the actual > archiving takes a bit longer. Done: update suite set accept_source_uploads = false, accept

Re: wheezy-security: New enigmail not showing up in arch Packages.gz

Hi, Salvatore Bonaccorso writes: > Explicitly adding ftp-masters (not sure if they just were bcc'ed) and > full quoting below. AFAICT, the old packages need to be decrufted: The old arch-dep enigmail packages should be gone with the next update of the security archive. I also removed some other

Re: Debian LTS: uploaded packages to wheezy-security not available

Markus Koschany writes: > thanks for looking into these issues. Yesterday I tried to upload > libxstream-java and libpdfbox-java. Dak doesn't seem to like them too. I > guess I'm very lucky in finding packages that were once not part of main... Yep, it looks like there were quite a few Java packa

Re: Debian LTS: uploaded packages to wheezy-security not available

Hi, Markus Koschany writes: > Am 04.05.2016 um 13:43 schrieb Markus Koschany: >> Hi Ansgar, >> >> In preparation for the default Java switch I have uploaded more packages >> to wheezy-security yesterday and most of them are available in the >> archive now. However some of them never showed up th

Re: Sending LTS changes to debian-lts-changes

Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Mon, 02 May 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: >> thank you for fixing the mirror bug. Moritz Mühlenhoff informed us on >> IRC that accepted mails for LTS uploads are still sent to dak AT >> security.debian.org. Can you filter those mails so that they are sent to >> debian-lt

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

Hi, Aurelien Jarno writes: > On 2016-04-26 23:52, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> please remove the non-lts architectures for wheezy-security from >> wanna-build and the buildds. Only amd64, armel, armhf and i386 are >> still supported. >> >> It would also be nice

Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

Hi, please remove the non-lts architectures for wheezy-security from wanna-build and the buildds. Only amd64, armel, armhf and i386 are still supported. It would also be nice if build logs for wheezy-security would be visible on buildd.d.o for future uploads. (As far as I know, LTS doesn't handl

Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, Mark Hymers writes: > So, basically, for those following along, Holger asked me to make sure > that squeeze LTS couldn't end up ahead of stable (wheezy). I therefore > added the following version constraints: > > mhy@franck:~$ dak admin v-c list-suite squeeze-lts > squeeze-lts MustBeNewerTha

Re: updates in aptitude appearing in "Upgradable packages" rather than "Security Updates"

Hi, Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Cedric Knight wrote: >> For wheezy, security updates appear the "Security Updates" section of >> the main view of the aptitude package manager. However, on servers >> using "deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-lts main contrib", >> secur

Re: Accepted debian-security-support 2014.09.07+deb6u1 (source all) into squeeze-lts

Hi, Christoph Biedl writes: > Source: debian-security-support [...] > Version: 2014.09.07+deb6u1 Packages uploaded to squeeze-lts should have a lower version than the one in unstable. Please make sure to use "~deb6u1" instead of "+deb6u1". Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...