On 10/9/21 4:04 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
This would be the ELTS (not LTS) repo at
https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/extended-lts/security-tracker/.
See the ELTS README at gitlab.com:freexian-lts/extended-lts
[...]
See
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> This would be the ELTS (not LTS) repo at
> https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/extended-lts/security-tracker/.
>
> See the ELTS README at gitlab.com:freexian-lts/extended-lts
[...]
> See
>
On 9/28/21 12:46 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Jeremiah,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:57:04PM -0400, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
(Jeremiah, shall I explain how to gather this data?)
so there are three very simple scripts involved, which are attached and which
I used to run every Monday and then
Hi Jeremiah,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:57:04PM -0400, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
> > (Jeremiah, shall I explain how to gather this data?)
so there are three very simple scripts involved, which are attached and which
I used to run every Monday and then I massaged them into one email, where I
hi,
today four packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- debian-archive-keyring (Utkarsh)
- krb5 (Adrian Bunk)
- ruby2.3 (Utkarsh)
- smarty3 (Abhijith PA)
and six for ELTS:
- ntfs-3g (Abhijith PA)
- ckeditor (Abhijith PA)
- gst-plugins-bad0.10 (Utkarsh)
- jsoup (Utkarsh)
- krb5 (Adrian Bunk)
-
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
LTS:
- cacti (Roberto C. Sánchez)
- qtbase-opensource-src (Utkarsh Gupta)
and none for ELTS.
Utkarsh probably claimed too many packages, 4:
- debian-archive-keyring
- qtbase-opensource-src
- ruby2.3
- tiff
No DLAs have been reserved and haven't
On 9/6/21 5:31 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- mupdf (codehelp)
and none for ELTS. Also noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Two DLAs which already have been reserved have not yet been published:
- DLA 2754-1 (04 Sep 2021) (pywps)
- DLA 2717-2 (27 Aug
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Two DLAs which already have been reserved have not yet been published:
[..]
> - DLA 2717-2 (27 Aug 2021) (redis)
Thanks for the reminder. This change has now been committed and will
be available on the website after the next run.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- mupdf (codehelp)
and none for ELTS. Also noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Two DLAs which already have been reserved have not yet been published:
- DLA 2754-1 (04 Sep 2021) (pywps)
- DLA 2717-2 (27 Aug 2021) (redis)
(Jeremiah, shall I explain how
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
-ruby2.3 (Utkarsh Gupta)
-rustc (Anton Gladky)
and none for ELTS.
Thorsten probably claimed too many packages:
- btrbk
- grilo
- openssl
- openssl1.0
- squashfs-tools
One DLA which already has been reserved has not yet been published:
- DLA
hi,
today no were unclaimed for LTS and ELTS, noone claimed too many packages
and there's also no DLA which has been reserved but not published, wheehoo,
that's awesome and a first, I think. :)
Have a good week!
--
cheers,
Holger
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On this past Friday, Raphaël put me in touch with Thorsten Glaser, who
had already prepared openjdk-8 package for jessie and stretch. I
reviewed and sponsored the upload, and the packages were literally in
the process of uploading when I saw this message. I will
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 10:52:00AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:38:15AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > It was completely my fault. [...]
>
> Mistakes happen, thank you for owning yours!
>
> > The update to dla-needed.txt
> > and ela-needed.txt
Hi Roberto,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:38:15AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> It was completely my fault. [...]
Mistakes happen, thank you for owning yours!
> The update to dla-needed.txt
> and ela-needed.txt did not even cross my mind.
Mistakes happen. I'm just emphasizing "the
Am Montag, dem 09.08.2021 um 06:38 -0400 schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
[...]
>
> It was completely my fault. According to Raphaël and Thorsten, Markus
> was not responding to emails. I assumed that because Raphaël requested
> someone get in touch with Thorsten, that I should simply contact
>
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 10:32:54AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:20:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
> > > - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> > >
> > > and
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 10:32:54AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:20:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
> > > - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> > >
> > > and
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 06:20:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
> > - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> >
> > and three for ELTS:
> > - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> On this past Friday, Raphaël put
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 08:43:34AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
> - nettle (Emilio)
> - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
> - pillow (codehelp)
>
> and three for ELTS:
> - nettle (Emilio)
> - openjdk-7 (Emilio)
> - openjdk-8 (Emilio)
>
> Utkarsh probably
hi,
today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- nettle (Emilio)
- openjdk-8 (Emilio)
- pillow (codehelp)
and three for ELTS:
- nettle (Emilio)
- openjdk-7 (Emilio)
- openjdk-8 (Emilio)
Utkarsh probably claimed too many packages:
- amd64-microcode
- exiv2
- ruby2.3
- usermode
One DLA which
hi,
today no package was unclaimed for LTS nor ELTS and noone claimed too
many packages neither. Yay!
Just a few DLAs need publishing:
- DLA 2723-1 (31 Jul 2021) (linuxptp)
- DLA 2722-1 (30 Jul 2021) (libsndfile)
- DLA 2721-1 (26 Jul 2021) (drupal7)
- DLA 2720-1 (26 Jul 2021) (aspell)
Have a
hi,
today no package was unclaimed for LTS and one for ELTS:
- ceph (Markus Koschany)
(looking at data/ela-needed.txt it's unclear to me why ceph is claimed at
all... -> please update the note to make that clear...)
Noone claimed too many packages and the same as last week and all DLAs which
hi,
if you reclaim packages which were unclaimed after 2 weeks of inactivity,
please update the notes *properly*. Updating the date of a note entry stating
'WIP' is not helpful for anyone wanting to contribute, especially if it's
WIP for two months or similar.
Also if it's WIP for weeks it
hi,
today several packages were unclaimed for LTS:
-ffmpeg (Anton Gladky)
-nettle (Emilio)
-ruby-actionpack-page-caching (Markus Koschany)
-ruby-kaminari (Markus Koschany)
-runc (Abhijith PA)
-shiro (Roberto C. Sánchez)
and two for ELTS:
-nettle (Emilio)
-openjdk-7 (Emilio)
Then Markus
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- ansible (Lee Garrett)
and none for ELTS.
Markus Koschany probably claimed too many packages:
- ceph
- condor
- ruby-actionpack-page-caching
- ruby-kaminari
All DLAs which have been reserved have been published, yay.
Have a great week!
--
cheers,
hi,
today just one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- rabbitmq-server (Abhijith PA)
No packages were unclaimed for ELTS and noone claimed 4 packages or more.
All reserved DLAs have been published! Yay!
Have a good week!
--
cheers,
Holger
moining,
today four packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- apache2 (Emilio)
- htmldoc (Utkarsh Gupta)
- nettle (Emilio)
- runc (Abhijith PA)
and four for ELTS:
- apache2 (Emilio)
- htmldoc (Utkarsh Gupta)
- nettle (Emilio)
- openjdk-7 (Emilio)
Then, noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Five DLAs
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 09:51:44AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Ah. I can see forgot to make sure it actually ended up on the website.
> I've merged the commit from my fork of the webwml.git repository and
> it should appear on the website in due course. Thanks for the
> pointers.
thanks for fixing
Hey,
> > The script checks:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/tree/master/english/lts/security/2021
> > Maybe you forgot to git-push there?
>
> https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ also does not show it.
Ah. I can see forgot to make sure it actually ended up on the website.
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 09:20:45AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> The script checks:
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/tree/master/english/lts/security/2021
> Maybe you forgot to git-push there?
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ also does not show it.
--
cheers,
Hi Chris,
The script checks:
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/tree/master/english/lts/security/2021
Maybe you forgot to git-push there?
- Sylvain
On 14/06/2021 09:08, Chris Lamb wrote:
Hi Holger,
Just three DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
Thanks
Hi Holger,
> Just three DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
Thanks for these. However, I think this is a false positive:
> - DLA 2676-1 (05 Jun 2021) (python-django)
This, I believe, has been published:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg4.html
moining,
today no packages were unclaimed for LTS nor ELTS, and nobody has claimed 4
packages
or more, yay.
Just three DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
- DLA 2685-1 (14 Jun 2021) (squid3)
- DLA 2684-1 (10 Jun 2021) (lasso)
- DLA 2676-1 (05 Jun 2021) (python-django)
Have
moining,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
-ceph (Emilio)
-thunderbird (Emilio)
and two for ELTS:
-ceph (Emilio)
-openjdk-7 (Emilio)
Nobody claimed 4 packages or more.
Two DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
- DLA 2678-1 (06 Jun 2021) (ruby-nokogiri)
- DLA 2676-1
hello again,
i'm back :) for the time being...
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- shiro (Roberto C. Sánchez)
and one for ELTS:
- ruby-nokogiri (Markus Koschany)
Nobody claimed 4 packages or more.
One DLA has been reserved and haven't been published yet:
- DLA 2668-1 (29 May 2021)
Hello,
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:23 AM Lynoure Braakman wrote:
> No one claimed more than 4 packages. Utkarsh claimed 4 packages, but
> having mrxvt, rxvt and uxvt-unicode claimed by different people wouldn't
> make very much sense, so no problem there.
Yep, all 4 packages are affected by the
hi,
No one claimed more than 4 packages. Utkarsh claimed 4 packages, but
having mrxvt, rxvt and uxvt-unicode claimed by different people wouldn't
make very much sense, so no problem there.
Following packages were unclaimed for LTS:
-php-phpseclib (Abhijith PA)
-phpseclib (Abhijith PA)
hi,
Nobody claimed 4 packages or more.
Following package was unclaimed for LTS:
-ansible (Markus Koschany)
Here I'm having doubts about needing to unclaim this... Do take it back
as you see fit, Markus.
Nothing was unclaimed for ELTS.
Only one reserved DLA has not been published yet:
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
-imagemagick (Anton Gladky)
and none for ELTS.
Only Abhijith PA has claimed 4 or more packages, but I assume it's
because php-phpseclib and phpseclib go inherently together, so no
problem at all.
Have a good week everybody!
--
Lynoure
Hi,
On 03/05/2021 16:40, Lynoure Braakman wrote:
Following DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
DLA 2637-1 (23 Apr 2021) (drupal7)
DLA 2610-1 (29 Mar 2021) (linux-4.19)
As FD, I have added these to the website (the other two were already done).
Cheers,
Emilio
On Monday 26 April 2021 17:39:01 CEST Lynoure Braakman wrote:
> Four DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
> DLA 2637-1 (23 Apr 2021) (drupal7)
> DLA 2636-1 (23 Apr 2021) (pjproject)
> DLA 2629-1 (18 Apr 2021) (libebml)
> DLA 2628-1 (17 Apr 2021) (python2.7)
> DLA 2618-2
hi,
As I am gradually taking coordination duties over fro Holger, here's my first
time doing these mails.
Nobody claimed 4 packages or more.
Nothing was unclaimed for LTS or ELTS.
Four DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
DLA 2637-1 (23 Apr 2021) (drupal7)
DLA 2636-1
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
LTS:
- cgal (Anton Gladky)
- gsoap (Abhijith PA)
and none for ELTS.
Nobody claimed 4 packages or more.
Four DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
- DLA 2629-1 (18 Apr 2021) (libebml)
- DLA 2628-1 (17 Apr 2021) (python2.7)
- DLA
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:43 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
> well, yes, but it was caught by the script I'm running each week?!?
I am actually not sure what to reply because all I wanted to convey is
that this was left unpublished and no one's at fault here, really.
Someone had to notice and
hi,
dropping the elts list..
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:41:27AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> I am not sure. This is a rare example of how a website update could go
> missing since this update was done entirely by another DD without
> anyone's help or coordination and might've missed the
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:26 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:04:44AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > > Twos DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
> > > - DLA 2613-1 (31 Mar 2021) (underscore)
> > This was issued by Yadd (the regular maintainer/team
Hi Utkarsh,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:04:44AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > Twos DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
> > - DLA 2613-1 (31 Mar 2021) (underscore)
> This was issued by Yadd (the regular maintainer/team member of the JS
> team) and hence was missing the website
Hi Holger,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 5:29 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> Twos DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
> - DLA 2613-1 (31 Mar 2021) (underscore)
This was issued by Yadd (the regular maintainer/team member of the JS
team) and hence was missing the website update. I've now
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- salt (Utkarsh)
- subversion (Emilio)
and one for ELTS:
- zeromq3 (Thorsten Alteholz)
Nobody claimed 4 packages or more.
Twos DLAs have been reserved and haven't been published yet:
- DLA 2613-1 (31 Mar 2021) (underscore)
- DLA 2610-1 (29 Mar
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- ansible (Markus Koschany)
- shiro (Roberto C. Sánchez)
and none for ELTS.
Also noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Six DLAs have been reserved and havn't been published yet:
- DLA 2618-1 (05 Apr 2021) (smarty3)
- DLA 2613-1 (31 Mar 2021)
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- xmlbeans (Roberto C. Sánchez)
and one for ELTS:
- phpldapadmin (Emilio)
Thorsten Alteholz probably claimed too many packages:
- golang-github-appc-cni
- ldb
- leptonlib
- libebml
One DLA has been reserved and hasn't been published yet:
- DLA
hi,
today no package was unclaimed for LTS and one for ELTS:
- tomcat7 (Utkarsh)
Noone claimed 4 packages or more.
One DLAs has been reserved today and hasn't been published yet, but I expect
this will happen any moment, so I'll keep quiet here and now.
--
cheers,
Holger
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- php-pear (Ola Lundqvist)
and none for ELTS.
Noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Two DLAs which already had been reserved last week have not yet been published:
- DLA 2592-1 (13 Mar 2021) (golang-1.8)
- DLA 2591-1 (13 Mar 2021) (golang-1.7)
--
hi,
today four packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- glib2.0 (Emilio)
- golang-1.7 (Sylvain Beucler)
- golang-1.8 (Sylvain Beucler)
- xmlbeans (Roberto C. Sánchez)
and two for ELTS:
- glib2.0 (Emilio)
- golang (Sylvain Beucler)
Noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Three DLAs which already had been
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- ceph (Emilio, like last week)
- dnsmasq (Utkarsh)
and one for ELTS too:
- dnsmasq (Utkarsh)
Utkarsh probably claimed too many packages, so one has been removed (see above):
- adminer
- dnsmasq
- python-aiohttp
- wpa
One DLA which already had
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- python-pysaml2 (Abhijith PA)
- shiro (Roberto C. Sánchez)
and two for ELTS too:
- ceph (Emilio)
- phpldapadmin (Emilio)
Noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Finally there are two DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been
published:
- DLA
hi,
today packages were unclaimed for
LTS:
- ansible (Markus Koschany)
ELTS:
- openjpeg2 (Roberto C. Sánchez)
Then, Thorsten Alteholz probably claimed too many packages:
- golang-github-appc-cni
- libebml
- openvswitch
- subversion
- wpa
And three DLA have been reserved but not yet been
hi,
today packages were unclaimed for
LTS:
- dnsmasq (Utkarsh)
- slirp (Thorsten)
- xmlbeans (Roberto)
ELTS:
- dnsmasq (Utkarsh)
Noone claimed too many packages.
One DLA has been reserved but not yet been published, but that was today...
- DLA 2549-1 (8 Feb 2021) (gdisk)
Have a great week!
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:32:13AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> One DLA has been reserved but not yet been published:
> - DLA 2537-1 (31 Jan 2021) (ffmpeg)
>
It looks like this was just merged/published.
> Have a great week!
>
You too!
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- ansible (Markus Koschany)
- shiro (Roberto C. Sánchez)
and none ELTS. Also noone claimed too many packages and no DLAs have been
reserved but not yet been published, hooray! Have a great week!
--
cheers,
Holger
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- ceph (Emilio)
- opendmarc (Abhijith PA)
and two for ELTS as well:
- ceph (Emilio)
- phpldapadmin (Emilio)
Noone claimed too many packages and no DLAs have been reserved but not yet
been published, hooray! Have a great week!
--
cheers,
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- shiro (Roberto C. Sánchez)
No package was unclaimed for ELTS.
Noone claimed too many packages.
Two DLAs have been reserved but not yet been published:
- DLA 2511-1 (30 Dec 2020) (highlight.js)
- DLA 2512-1 (03 Jan 2021) (libhibernate3-java)
--
hi,
today no packages were unclaimed for LTS, no packages were unclaimed for ELTS,
noone claimed too many packages and there is just one DLAs which has been
reserved
but not yet been published:
- DLA 2505-1 (23 Dec 2020) (spip)
Whooohooo! Have a great week!
--
cheers,
Holger
hi,
today no packages were unclaimed for LTS, no packages were unclaimed for ELTS,
noone claimed too many packages and there are no DLAs which have been reserved
but not yet been published.
Whooohooo! That's a first! Have a great week!
--
cheers,
Holger
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- slirp (Thorsten Alteholz)
- spice-vdagent (Abhijith PA)
and none for ELTS.
Noone claimed too many packages.
Finally there four two DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
- DLA 2494-1 (14 Dec 2020) (linux)
- DLA 2490-1 (10 Dec
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- snapd (Brian May)
and none for ELTS.
Thorsten Alteholz probably claimed too many, 4, packages: minidlna openjpeg2
slirp x11vnc
Finally there are two DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
- DLA 2483-1 (05 Dec 2020) (linux-4.19)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 08:08:55AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> There are two DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
> - DLA 2463-1 (22 Nov 2020) (samba)
> - DLA 2379-3 (21 Nov 2020) (mediawiki)
I've just merged those debian-www MRs so these DLAs should be on the website
any
hi,
today is a nice Monday:
- no packages were unclaimed for LTS.
- no packages were unclaimed for ELTS.
There are two DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
- DLA 2463-1 (22 Nov 2020) (samba)
- DLA 2379-3 (21 Nov 2020) (mediawiki)
Markus probably claimed too many packages:
Abhijith PA writes:
> Also my issue is cleared and jupyter-notebook *accepted* . I hope
> golang-github-ncw-rclone-dev cleared too.
Yes, the two packages of mine that were waiting now got in.
--
Brian May
Hello Brian,
On 17/11/20 2:14 am, Brian May wrote:
> Abhijith PA writes:
>
>> I generated DLA for jupyter-notebook just before upload. But upload was
>> rejected due to `Built-Using refers to non-existing source package`. I have
>> pinged ftp masters couple of times to manually move needed
Abhijith PA writes:
> I generated DLA for jupyter-notebook just before upload. But upload was
> rejected due to `Built-Using refers to non-existing source package`. I have
> pinged ftp masters couple of times to manually move needed packages to
> security-master. If any ftp masters here, please
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:36:23PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> These used to include the DLA number. Maybe those could be back?
copy error on my side, sorry.
- DLA 2446-1 (10 Nov 2020) (moin)
- DLA 2432-1 (04 Nov 2020) (jupyter-notebook)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
Hi,
On 16/11/20 5:06 pm, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi,
...
> fwiw the jupyter-notebook DLA is not in -announce either, so it's not just
> missing in the website.
I generated DLA for jupyter-notebook just before upload. But upload was
rejected due to `Built-Using refers to non-existing
Hi,
On 16/11/2020 11:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
- (15 Nov 2020) (libvncserver)
- (10 Nov 2020) (moin)
- (04 Nov 2020) (jupyter-notebook)
These used to include the DLA number. Maybe those could be back?
fwiw the
hi,
today is a nice Monday:
- no packages were unclaimed for LTS.
- no packages were unclaimed for ELTS.
- noone claimed too many packages.
There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published:
- (15 Nov 2020) (libvncserver)
- (10 Nov 2020) (moin)
- (04 Nov 2020)
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- brotli (Roberto C. Sánchez)
- zeromq3 (Adrian Bunk)
and three for ELTS:
- libdatetime-timezone-perl (Adrian Bunk)
- tzdata (Adrian Bunk)
- zeromq3 (Adrian Bunk)
Related, Adrian Bunk probably claimed too many (4) packages:
- cimg
-
hi,
today, one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- python3.5 (Thorsten Alteholz)
and one for ELTS:
- phpmyadmin (Emilio)
Then, noone claimed 4 packages or more. And also no DLA has been reserved but
not yet published.
Have a great week!
--
cheers,
Holger
hi,
today, again, no packages were unclaimed for LTS and ELTS, whoooray!
Then Adrian Bunk probably claimed too many packages (5):
libdatetime-timezone-perl qtsvg-opensource-src tzdata wireshark zeromq3
And just one DLA has been reserved but not yet published:
- DLA 2415-1 (25 Oct 2020)
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- shiro (Roberto C. Sánchez)
- tinymce (Abhijith PA)
plus I added linux-4.19 to the (short) list of packages to be ignored from
unclaiming, as Ben is taking care of it.
For ELTS one package was unclaimed:
- samba (Mike Gabriel)
Then, noone
hi,
today is a very special day:
*No* packages were unclaimed for LTS nor ELTS.
*Noone* claimed 4 packages or more.
Finally, there are *no* DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been
published!
That's pretty awesome!
Just unfortunatly I'm having a pretty busy Monday so I'm not sure if I
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- cimg (Thorsten Alteholz)
- php-horde-trean (Mike Gabriel)
and none for ELTS.
Also, noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Finally, there are four DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been
published:
- DLA 2394-1 (02 Oct 2020) (squid3)
- DLA
hi,
today one package was unclaimed for LTS:
- ceph (Ola Lundqvist)
and none for ELTS.
Also, noone claimed 4 packages or more.
Finally, there are four DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been
published:
- DLA 2385-1 (26 Sep 2020) (linux-4.19)
- DLA 2384-1 (26 Sep 2020) (yaws)
- DLA
hi,
today three packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- ark (Abhijith PA)
- guacamole-client (Mike Gabriel)
- samba (Mike Gabriel)
and two for ELTS:
- clamav (Utkarsh Gupta)
- rails (Mike Gabriel)
Then, noone claimed too many packages, yay!
Also, while there are two DLAs which have been reserved
hi,
today five packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- freerdp (Mike Gabriel)
- gnome-shell (Mike Gabriel)
- php-horde-trean (Mike Gabriel)
- ruby-json-jwt (Utkarsh Gupta)
- ruby-kaminari (Utkarsh Gupta)
- ruby-rack-cors (Utkarsh Gupta)
and two for ELTS:
- samba (Mike Gabriel)
- squid3 (Markus
hi,
today two packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- curl (Thorsten Alteholz)
- squid3 (Markus Koschany)
and one for ELTS:
- curl (Thorsten Alteholz)
Then, one person probably claimed too many packages:
Mike Gabriel: freerdp gnome-shell guacamole-client php-horde-trean samba
There are six
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 03:41:25PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> I consider each separately and I can write a detailed rationale, but I
> feel out-of-place doing so (I'm not the one designing and justifying the
> procedures), and 10 days with no activity feels a bit long to resume
> this kind of
Hi,
On 31/08/2020 14:44, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>> Still in this particular case, in our process the team coordinator cites
>> contributors by running a heuristic-based script, and forwarding it
>> verbatim to the team (and the
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> In this particular case of missing web imports, one real issue is a
> fragile workflow involving duplicate mail/web announcements due to lack
> of automation/integration.
sure, and my remarks are just to help with this sub-optimal
hi,
today four packages were unclaimed for LTS:
- asyncpg (Utkarsh Gupta)
- firefox-esr (Emilio)
- guacamole-client (Mike Gabriel)
- jupyter-notebook (Mike Gabriel)
and one for ELTS:
- clamav (Utkarsh Gupta)
Then, it seems the end of the month is near and 3 people probably claimed too
many
hi,
today one package was unclaimed each for
LTS:
- nss (Adrian Bunk)
and ELTS:
- apache2 (Utkarsh Gupta)
Then, it seems the end of the month is near and 4 people probably claimed too
many packages:
Adrian Bunk: nss openexr qt4-x11 qtbase-opensource-src
Mike Gabriel: freerdp
Hi,
On 20/08/2020 19:37, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> p.s.: as an after thought re: "don't harass me" (though I get it was a
>>> joke, but I think the joke conveyed a useful notion): maybe my semiautomatic
>>> mails should have a permanent disclaimer that being 'called out' by them is
>>> nothing bad
Hi Sylvain,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 04:31:28PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> I was thinking of 24h, in which case it's perfectly justified to be
> notified.
> Anyway I settled for printing the DLA date.
thanks, I like that the date and package name is printed now. I slightly dislike
not naming
Hi
On 18/08/2020 00:08, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I believe that wouldn't change anything. If the script would only
> complain about DLA reservations X hours old, of course $you would send
> the DLA right after my mail / after X hours + 2 minutes.
I was thinking of 24h, in which case it's perfectly
Hi,
According to
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Claim_a_DLA_ID_in_DLA.2Flist
one reserves the DLA number right /after/ the upload, with a dated entry
in data/DLA/list, so it's meant to be used quickly.
That being said, I modified the script to not only s/committer/package/,
but also
Hi
One thing to consider when implementing a delay. You typically reserve the
DLA some time before making the update so the time you select will most
likely be wrong.
Based on this I tend to agree with Holger that any time you select will not
be suitable. :-)
But sure some delay may be ok.
//
hi Sylvain,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:45:03PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > - DLA 2332-1 (reserved by Sylvain Beucler)
> I just uploaded it, I am waiting for the ftp confirmation mail, I didn't
> even send it by e-mail yet - don't harass me!! ;)
>
> More seriously, we could add a delay.
I
Hi,
On 17/08/2020 23:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
> There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published on
> www.debian.org:
>
> - DLA 2332-1 (reserved by Sylvain Beucler)
I just uploaded it, I am waiting for the ftp confirmation mail, I didn't
even send it by e-mail yet -
hi,
today no package was unclaimed for LTS, while I did unclaim two packages for
ELTS:
- openjdk-7 (Emilio)
- openjdk-8 (Roberto C. Sánchez)
Then, Mike Gabriel probably claimed too many packages for LTS:
- freerdp
- gnome-shell
- guacamole-client
- jupyter-notebook
- libvncserver
There
hi,
today there was one package unclaimed for LTS:
- condor (Roberto C. Sánchez)
and for ELTS:
- clamav (Utkarsh Gupta)
- python2.7 (Thorsten Alteholz)
- squid3 (Markus Koschany)
Noone claimed 4 packages or more.
There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published on
hi,
today there was one package unclaimed for LTS:
- imagemagick (Markus Koschany)
and none for ELTS.
Emilio probably claimed too many packages, 4:
- clamav
- firefox-esr
- libx11
- openjdk-8
There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published on
www.debian.org:
- DLA
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
