On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Bálint Réczey wrote:
FTR the package has been accepted on the same day. However I have not seen
DLA-198-1 on debian-lts-announce@l.d.o (did your forget to sign it?).
I tried sending it several times even after subscirbing the list but
they did not go throught.
I have
On Dienstag, 14. April 2015, Bálint Réczey wrote:
squeeze-lts, both in *.changes and *.changelog.
The binary package names changed quite a lot so I think entering NEW
was reasonable.
ah. makes sense :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Balint,
On Dienstag, 14. April 2015, Bálint Réczey wrote:
I have prepared the DLA and uploaded the fixed package but it ended up in
NEW. Dear FTP Masters, please accept it.
what distribution did you use in debian/changelog?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 01:05 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
[...]
I assume this situation is not unique to Wireshark. What do you think,
what would be the best for the LTS project in Wireshark's case and
what is the general LTS strategy in similar cases?
I think the best approach would be either:
Hi Raphael,
2015-04-10 23:59 GMT+02:00 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
Hello Balint,
I would like to clarify the situation of wireshark in squeeze.
In https://bugs.debian.org/774312 you requested to mark the
package as not-supported and this has now been done.
So in theory I should tag
