Hi Ola,
El 27/04/24 a las 19:07, Ola Lundqvist escribió:
> Hi Santiago
>
> Sorry for the delayed response. For a while I thought something was
> wrong with my browser (making me wait until I had access to a better
> computer, not my phone) but after a while I realized that the link you
> pointed
Hi Santiago
Sorry for the delayed response. For a while I thought something was
wrong with my browser (making me wait until I had access to a better
computer, not my phone) but after a while I realized that the link you
pointed me to does not point to a file or line.
I understand it is in task.c
Hi Ola,
El 19/04/24 a las 07:54, Ola Lundqvist escribió:
> Hi
>
> I have now made the package build.
Thank you for preparing the patch. I've built, tested basic
functionality and tested reversed dependencies.
However, I have a question: could you please point me where do you get
from the
Hi
I have now made the package build.
Cheers
// Ola
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 23:20, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> Hi Sean, all
>
> I'm starting to lean toward your idea, to release a snapshot version,
> but I have a concern about that.
> To me it looks like 9.11 track have actually an ABI change. It
Hi Sean, all
I'm starting to lean toward your idea, to release a snapshot version,
but I have a concern about that.
To me it looks like 9.11 track have actually an ABI change. It is not
so visible but a data structure is changed to increase the size and
I'm not 100% sure this is ABI compatible. I
Hello Ola,
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 01:56pm +02, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Thank you for your help. Before I continue I would like to check one thing
> with you. You
> seem to be "ahead of me" in this work. Do you want to take over this work so
> we
> reassign the claim to you or do you want me to
Hi Sean
See below.
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 at 04:17, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat 13 Apr 2024 at 10:04am +02, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > See the other mail thread. We risk breaking things since we go from
> > 9.11 to 9.16.
> > I think this is still worth investigating since bind9 is a
Hi Sean
Thank you for your help. Before I continue I would like to check one thing
with you. You seem to be "ahead of me" in this work. Do you want to take
over this work so we reassign the claim to you or do you want me to
continue?
I have no problem either way. Just want to check because you
Hello,
On Sun 14 Apr 2024 at 10:14am +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat 13 Apr 2024 at 10:04am +02, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
>> Do you happen to have reference to specific commits to look at?
>> You seem to have that since you refer to them as too big to backport.
>
> Yes, here you go,
Hello,
On Sat 13 Apr 2024 at 10:04am +02, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> See the other mail thread. We risk breaking things since we go from
> 9.11 to 9.16.
> I think this is still worth investigating since bind9 is a well
> written piece of software,
> but here we need to weigh the risk of breaking
Hello,
On Sat 13 Apr 2024 at 10:04am +02, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Do you happen to have reference to specific commits to look at?
> You seem to have that since you refer to them as too big to backport.
Yes, here you go, hopefully this format is helpful:
* 92b4f88bc8..: Michał Kępień
Hi Adrian
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 at 13:33, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:12:34PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> >...
> > - looks like backporting the old branches is what's done in bullseye and
> > bookworm; do you know of some reason we're not doing this for buster too?
>
>
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:12:34PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
>...
> - looks like backporting the old branches is what's done in bullseye and
> bookworm; do you know of some reason we're not doing this for buster too?
bind9 in buster provides shared libraries,
with soversion changes in every
Hi Sean
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 at 16:13, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:51pm +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> > I've started looking at the first vulnerability, CVE-2023-4408, and have
> > some confusions/questions.
> >
> > The ISC website that 9.11 is EOL as of March
On 31.03.24 15:51, Sean Whitton wrote:
Finally, do you you have any notes on testing?
I couldn't run the testsuite during package build, so I created a Jessie
and Stretch VM, run the network configure script and manually started
the testsuite.
Thorsten
Hello,
On Sun 31 Mar 2024 at 09:51pm +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I've started looking at the first vulnerability, CVE-2023-4408, and have
> some confusions/questions.
>
> The ISC website that 9.11 is EOL as of March 2022. But there is a lot
> of activity on the 9.11 branch, including a fix for
[moving to the ML]
On Sat 23 Mar 2024 at 06:14am -04, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> If you happen to need any help or review, I have worked on some
> complex issues for bind9 in the past and I would be happy to assist.
I've started looking at the first vulnerability, CVE-2023-4408, and have
some
17 matches
Mail list logo
