On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 11:02:35PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:02:07AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > To claim that "because this bug affects me, it *must* be
> > fixed, even when it does not meet the criteria for a normal security bug
> > and when the maintainer
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:02:07AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> To claim that "because this bug affects me, it *must* be
> fixed, even when it does not meet the criteria for a normal security bug
> and when the maintainer thinks there is a risk of breaking working
> configurations for other
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:41:36PM +0200, Christopher Huhn wrote:
> Given that will give you an updated package in Bullseye you'd still have to
> change your code to change the GDBM_PREREAD behaviour.
Do you mean that something changed in bookworm that will create a problem for
my
Hello,
Thank you for your answers.
In short: the work-around that I mentionned in the bug report is in place, and
it works for me. The problem is "solved" for me and it does not look that any
further effort to fix it in bullseye will work.
Long version:
Although it seems that ALL users of that
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:41:36PM +0200, Christopher Huhn wrote:
> [SNIP a bunch of good recommdnations for getting a patch accepted]
Definitely, that is the way to go if someone wants to get a bug fixed in
a release before it becomes LTS.
> That said, LTS point releases do contain functional
Am 25.08.23 um 12:30 schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
I reported this:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043023
The first reason is that bugs of this nature (i.e., bugs that are not of
a serious security nature, but which might still require a fix) are
handled by the
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 06:45:55AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
>this bug is not specific, the proble is that not all users report the
>problems, just change the distro.. a normal tendency
>in my case i downgrade to strecth and just works.. upgrading its not
>always the right
Hello Marc,
On 25/08/2023 11:24, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
AFAIK is bullseye not yet LTS-handled.
Will LTS fixes important bugs, or only security fixes?
I reported this:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043023
I have a local work-around (keep the buster version), and the
this bug is not specific, the proble is that not all users report the
problems, just change the distro.. a normal tendency
in my case i downgrade to strecth and just works.. upgrading its not always
the right choose
its pretty unconfortable that an important bug will be not solved just cos
"its
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 11:24:18AM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> AFAIK is bullseye not yet LTS-handled.
>
That is correct. This transition will happen in mid-2024.
> Will LTS fixes important bugs, or only security fixes?
>
Generally speaking, the LTS team focuses only on fixing
Hello,
AFAIK is bullseye not yet LTS-handled.
Will LTS fixes important bugs, or only security fixes?
I reported this:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043023
I have a local work-around (keep the buster version), and the maintainer also
proposed another local work-around.
11 matches
Mail list logo
