Hi Thijs,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Nor do I have a good understanding of who is working on LTS. People are
hired by the hour, so if I send something to someone personally now it may
just be that they're not working on LTS this week.
hmm, not working on LTS doesn't mean that
Hi Thijs,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> It seems at least from my perspective that the LTS team is a loosely
> defined consortium of individuals which makes sharing the embargoed
> information problematic. If I have an embargoed issue I think there's
> usually no problem sharing th
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> It seems at least from my perspective that the LTS team is a loosely
> defined consortium of individuals which makes sharing the embargoed
> information problematic. If I have an embargoed issue I think there's
> usually no problem sharing
On Wed, January 28, 2015 11:29, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Yes, I was wondering how we could improve on the current status for the
> handling of medium/high-severity issues, and I'm interested in the
> Debian security team's opinion about that.
>
> Should the Debian LTS team apply to join the linux-di
Hi,
On 28/01/15 at 11:13 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Of course we do! That said the current LTS team doesn't have access
> > to embargoed information and thus nobody prepared the update in advance.
>
> Lucas now contacted me abou
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Of course we do! That said the current LTS team doesn't have access
> to embargoed information and thus nobody prepared the update in advance.
Lucas now contacted me about this and he said he would try to start with some
informal discuss
Hello Sébastien,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Sebastien Dupas wrote:
> Due to the announce of the GHOST security flaw, we need to update our
> systems using Debian squeeze.
>
> Do you plan to release the security update of the eglibc and related
> packages?
Of course we do! That said the current LTS tea
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 13:39 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 23:47 +0100, Nicolas Chipaux wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > For our internal use at Gandi.net, we created a source package for eglibc
> > with the fix for the CVE 2015-0235 taken from the eglibc package from
> > D
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 23:47 +0100, Nicolas Chipaux wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> For our internal use at Gandi.net, we created a source package for eglibc
> with the fix for the CVE 2015-0235 taken from the eglibc package from
> Debian wheezy 2.13-38+deb7u7 : any/cvs-gethostbyname.diff. In order to
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:47:14PM +0100, Nicolas Chipaux wrote:
> In order to release quickly, we disabled the test in this patch during
> the build.
As an aside, you should be able to skip the testsuite by setting
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck (but it might be tricky to get into the build
environmen
Hello folks,
For our internal use at Gandi.net, we created a source package for eglibc
with the fix for the CVE 2015-0235 taken from the eglibc package from
Debian wheezy 2.13-38+deb7u7 : any/cvs-gethostbyname.diff. In order to
release quickly, we disabled the test in this patch during the buil
Hello,
Due to the announce of the GHOST security flaw, we need to update our
systems using Debian squeeze.
Do you plan to release the security update of the eglibc and related
packages?
Thank you.
Regards.
--
\o/ Sébastien Dupas
G Gandi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@l
12 matches
Mail list logo
