Here's the summary of my work on Debian LTS for February 2016:
* investigating about update of ntp
* update libebml in squeeze-lts
This is my first month working on Debian LTS and I managed to work
only 3.9 hours out of the allocated 11.25. The reason for this was
mostly me not trying hard en
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:08:56PM +, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> On 2016-03-01, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > @Security Team: Shall we (LTS contributors) handle wheezy-security
> > updates like described below until Debian wheezy LTS comes into play?
> >
> >o Pick a package that has open CVE
Any help with the following would be greatly appreciated!
-
Symptoms:
-
Issues:
- Existing and new inbound TCP connections failed. However, system did
respond to TCP connect (good 3-way handshake... j
I understand that the plan is not to create a separate package suite for
Wheezy as was done for Squeeze and to upload to wheezy-security instead. How
are uploads that aren't strictly security uploads going to be handled?
Specifically, I'm wondering what to do about clamav since we've been upload
On 2016-03-01, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> @Security Team: Shall we (LTS contributors) handle wheezy-security
> updates like described below until Debian wheezy LTS comes into play?
>
>o Pick a package that has open CVE issues in wheezy, e.g. from
> above list
>o Add the package to data/
Am 29.02.2016 um 18:04 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Matthias Klose, the OpenJDK maintainer, stated that he intends to
>> support OpenJDK 6 until Ubuntu 12.04 reaches EOL in April 2017 [1] and I
>> think it should be feasible to mirror this approach for W
Am 01.03.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Bonno Bloksma (list account):
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-02-29 20:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
>>> wheezy.
>>
>> I think that (what you wrote ealier) would be a sensible recommendation to
>> make.
>>
>> We
Hi,
On 2016-02-29 20:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
>> wheezy.
>
> I think that (what you wrote ealier) would be a sensible recommendation to
> make.
>
> We're only keeping Wheezy around for system setups that were established
>
Hi,
On Montag, 29. Februar 2016, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > If it helps I could remove the "Debian 7 Wheezy" part and write
> > "we recommend that you upgrade your systems".
> That fully resolves the issue I was having with the text.
agreed & please post this! & thanks! :-)
cheers,
Holger
On Di 01 Mär 2016 08:44:08 CET, Guido Günther wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:15:28AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
[..snip..]
>>Issues that are unfixed in wheezy but fixed in squeeze:
>>* aptdaemon-> CVE-2015-1323
>>* cakephp -> TEMP-000-698CF7
>>* dhcpcd
10 matches
Mail list logo
