Re: working for wheezy-security until wheezy-lts starts

Brian May writes: > libpostproc-dev will be uninstallable - does this matter? Whoops. Just noticed that libpostproc-dev is provided by the old libav, however not provided by the new libav. I had thought it was another source package. So any packages that depend on it will need

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

]] Raphael Hertzog I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here. > The LTS period is about to start soon and we will send out an announce > soon... it would be nice to be able to say a word about armel/armhf, so > an official confirmation from ftpmasters/DSA would be nice. So, I'm a bit divided on

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

On 2016-04-16 18:46:50, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:20:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> (Fixed list address, sorry for the duplicate.) >> >> Hi, >> >> I have looked at porting the security fixes on the libidn package from >> squeeze to wheezy. As usual, signed

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:17:19pm -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2016-04-16 18:46:50, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:20:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> (Fixed list address, sorry for the duplicate.) > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have looked at porting the