On 12/02/2019 15:44, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 07:44:41AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
>>
>> That was very stupid of me. I was working on CVE-2018-1000888 in
>> php-pear and this ships via php5 in jessie. I didn't noticed php5
>> already entered dla-needed.txt and I went
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 01:58:24PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>On 11/02/2019 02:38, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Next: live images? cloud images?
>
>I found cloud images for openstack in
>
>https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/OpenStack/archive/
ACK.
>But can't find any jessie live
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 01:38:05AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 11:23:54AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>
>>I have done an automated install (ncurses frontend, installing GNOME) using
>>the
>>netinst/amd64 image, with an LVM encrypted volume. I have also tested
package: www.debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: debian-lts@lists.debian.org
Hi,
this is a bug to track fixing this small glitch in the new /lts/security/ area:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> >> *
package: security-tracker
x-debbugs-cc: debian-lts@lists.debian.org
Hi,
this is a bug to track fixing this small glitch in the new
www.debian.org/lts/security/ area:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> >> * Adaptation in the security tracker so the new URL paths
Hi Salvatore,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 08:13:18AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I have the attached patch commited in a local branch, but want first
> to confirm is this the final intended URL to reach the DLAs?
> -return
>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:56:41PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> It's true there's a lot of junk in there... I suspect most of the `.pl`
> scripts in there could actually be symlink to the main secteam scripts,
> because they are basically the same.
>
> I also suspect most of the stuff is
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > I think we want the other DLAs linked from the indexes as well.
> > shall we file a bug to not forget this?
> I looked into this, and couldn't figure it out.
> Please do file a bug for now, I have no idea how to fix this...
