I have googled high and low and got no recent comment/thoughts/etc on
whether or not there is even consideration of a Wheezy LTS.
If you would think about the idea of LTS you woul not have to think about
this google thingy.
I understand that it would be dependant on the success (or not) of
Hi,
On Montag, 30. März 2015, Michael Banck wrote:
Please keep in mind that wheezy will get regular maintenance for one
year after the jessie release, so the question whether there will be a
wheezy-lts or not is not imminent.
while I agree that the question is not imminent, I do think this
On Montag, 30. März 2015, Holger Levsen wrote:
_now_, as it's an important factor when deciding whether to deploy jessie
soon, whether it will have 2 or 5 years security support.
3 or 5
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
I have recently started to investigate whether I could fix some open LTS
issues and discovered the entry for libspring-2.5-java. According to
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libspring-2.5-java
there is no open
Hi Markus,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
there is no open security issue left. Is this an oversight? Otherwise I
might take a closer look and work on a fix. In addition I would be happy
if someone added me to the security-testing project on alioth, so that I
On 30/03/2015, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Squeeze LTS misses a security-supported browser
A number of web browsers that are present in Debian 6, are completely
unsupported.
These include, but, are not limited to, Arora, Rekonq, etc.
Each of those has its particular advantages,
