Re: Supporting libav in wheezy

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:13:34PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > (Please CC me, I'm not subscribed.) > > Hi > > On 2016-05-02 20:46:37, Brian May wrote: > > Raphael Hertzog writes: > > > > > There's also an alternate way to go forward...

Re: Unsupported packages for Wheezy LTS

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:10:48PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > No, I recommend to EOL src:qemu/qemu-kvm in wheezy (the bits relevant to > > src:xen are > > somewhat isolated and can be backported from the Xen Security announcements) > > Backporting jessie's qemu will end up in a similar

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:28:50pm +1000, Brian May wrote: > Added CC Debian Libidn Team > > I now have fixed the packages libidn packages initially produced by > Alessandro Ghedini and destined for wheezy-security and jessie-security. > They now build fine. > > In

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

Antoine Beaupré writes: > I reviewed the patch quickly, nothing strikes me as completely wrong, > but I am not currently in a position to test the patchset. Unless there are any objections I plan on rechecking this and uploading this to wheezy-security, Monday, Melbourne

Re: Xen 4.1.6.1 backport + Ubuntu patches ready for testing (take 3)

"Simon Iremonger (debian)" writes: >>> So there's *another* escalation through Qemu/HVM to backport. I wonder >>> if it's worth postponing this upload? > By the looks of things that only affects HVM mode and only with > a non-default video adapter. > > I think the other