On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 11:23, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> >> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
> >
> > As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a
> > 0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to
On 09.12.2016 11:23, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
>> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
>
> As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a
> 0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to wheezy-backports.
>
> Enjoy :)
>
Hi,
I cannot really recommend
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Chris Lamb wrote:
> If that workflow is a burden to you, feel free to just prepare an
> updated source package and send it to debian-lts@lists.debian.org
> (via a debdiff, or with an URL pointing to the source package,
> or even with a pointer to your packaging repository),
Santiago Vila wrote:
> I'd like to fix this in unstable first, then I guess it would be a
> little easier for you to make the update for wheezy. Is that ok?
Perfect. Many thanks.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
Hi Chris,
Am 09.12.2016 um 11:23 schrieb Chris Lamb:
> Hi Christoph,
>
>> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
>
> As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a
> 0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to wheezy-backports.
>
Thanks a lot.
Christoph
--
Hi,
will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
Regards
Christoph
Am 08.12.2016 um 20:01 schrieb Chris Lamb:
> Package: roundcube
> Version: 0.7.2-9+deb7u5
> Debian Bug : 847287
>
> It was discovered that there was a vulnerability where a remote
