Wheezy update of firebird2.5?

Dear maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of firebird2.5: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-6369 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined

Wheezy update of tiff?

Dear maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of tiff: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-10266 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-10267

Wheezy update of apt-cacher?

Dear maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of apt-cacher: https://bugs.debian.org/858739 (no CVE yet) Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined here:

Wheezy update of apparmor?

Dear maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of apparmor: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-6507 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined

Re: Bug#858230: reproducing the recent PCRE issues

Hi Matthew, On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 05:00:35PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Hi, > > > I've tried to reproduce the PCRE3 issues from CVE-2017-7186. > > CVE-2017-7244, CVE-2017-7245 and CVE-2017-7246 are similar fuzzing > > attacks so this probably applies to those as well. > > Thanks for

Re: reproducing the recent PCRE issues

Hi, I've tried to reproduce the PCRE3 issues from CVE-2017-7186. CVE-2017-7244, CVE-2017-7245 and CVE-2017-7246 are similar fuzzing attacks so this probably applies to those as well. Thanks for looking at these. I fixed CVE-2017-7186 with upstream's patch in sid. It's unfortunate that

Re: Wheezy update of ca-certificates?

Am 25.03.2017 um 11:44 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 25/03/17 09:32, Paul Wise wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I note that there have been some CA removals and additions that would >> be nice to have in wheezy, in particular the ISRG Root for LE, thoughts? > > I was just thinking about an update

Re: Wheezy update of ca-certificates?

On 25/03/17 09:32, Paul Wise wrote: > Hi all, > > I note that there have been some CA removals and additions that would > be nice to have in wheezy, in particular the ISRG Root for LE, thoughts? I was just thinking about an update of ca-certificates on wheezy yesterday, but due to the removal

Accepted python3.2 3.2.3-7+deb7u1 (source all amd64) into oldstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:07:33 + Source: python3.2 Binary: python3.2 python3.2-minimal libpython3.2 python3.2-examples python3.2-dev idle-python3.2 python3.2-doc python3.2-dbg Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 3.2.3-7+deb7u1

Wheezy update of ca-certificates?

Hi all, I note that there have been some CA removals and additions that would  be nice to have in wheezy, in particular the ISRG Root for LE, thoughts? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part