Brian May writes:
> I can reproduce CVE-2018-19210. Both on wheezy and stretch. Doesn't
Me getting distributions confused. I tested on Jessie, and I was able to
reproduce the problem. I did not test wheezy.
--
Brian May
Brian May writes:
> Ola Lundqvist writes:
>
>> Could it be so that the problem is only reproducible on 32-bit
>> systems?
>
> Good point. Will try.
Nope. Can't reproduce i386 build on amd64 kernel. I would be rather
surprised if choice of kernel mattered.
I can reproduce CVE-2018-19210. Both
Ola Lundqvist writes:
> Could it be so that the problem is only reproducible on 32-bit
> systems?
Good point. Will try.
--
Brian May
Hi
Could it be so that the problem is only reproducible on 32-bit systems?
// Ola
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 07:30, Brian May wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist writes:
>
> > Interesting. I wonder what the fix do differently in this case. It is a
> > little worrying that it exit with a zero return code, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:50:22 +0100
Source: rustc
Binary: rustc libstd-rust-1.24 libstd-rust-dev rust-gdb rust-lldb rust-doc
rust-src
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.24.1+dfsg1-1~deb8u2
Distribution: jessie-security
Urgency:
