Re: firefox on buster

2023-08-31 Thread Chris Frey
I see firefox esr 102.15.x has been released on bullseye. Do I dare hope that buster will be blessed with a similar update? Thanks! - Chris On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 12:24:17PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On 07/08/2023 23:57, Chris Frey wrote: > > I noticed firefox

Debian LTS report for August 2023

2023-08-31 Thread Guilhem Moulin
During the month of August 2023 and on behalf of Freexian, I worked on the following: * DLA-3515-1 for cjose=0.6.1+dfsg1-1+deb10u1 [CVE-2023-37464] https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/?m=zmzs4jlh%2bwykb...@debian.org * DLA-3551-1 for otrs2=6.0.16-2+deb10u1 [CVE-2019-11358,

[SECURITY] [DLA 3552-1] gst-plugins-ugly1.0 security update

2023-08-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - - Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3552-1debian-...@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Adrian Bunk August 31, 2023

Accepted gst-plugins-ugly1.0 1.14.4-1+deb10u2 (source) into oldoldstable

2023-08-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 23:06:22 +0300 Source: gst-plugins-ugly1.0 Architecture: source Version: 1.14.4-1+deb10u2 Distribution: buster-security Urgency: medium Maintainer: Maintainers of GStreamer packages Changed-By: Adrian Bunk

Accepted firefox-esr 102.15.0esr-1~deb10u1 (source) into oldoldstable

2023-08-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:46:53 +0200 Source: firefox-esr Architecture: source Version: 102.15.0esr-1~deb10u1 Distribution: buster-security Urgency: medium Maintainer: Maintainers of Mozilla-related packages Changed-By: Emilio Pozuelo

Re: opendmarc 1.3.2-6+deb10u3 postinst hangs

2023-08-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: seems that the postinst file hangs, missing db_stop line On 30.08.23 08:37, Chris Lamb wrote: Thanks for the report; I will release an updated version within a few hours max. thank you, the upgrade passed corrrectly on machine I encountered this problem