On 05/23/2015 03:44 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
See
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using#Add_squeeze-lts_to_your_sources.list.
...
I don't see why it wouldn't still work, though it's likely to run slower
again. Maybe time for new hardware?
Ben.
Thanks Ben. Well I am reluctant to invest in
On 05/23/2015 12:36 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
tried searching for more RAM? there's also some small probability to get
better/faster CPU for the same socket, e.g. Pentium 3.
I'm afraid xfce won't be very fast on such machine, switching to LXDE
_could_ help (not sure tho).
However, if
Hi,
Probably after some faulty misconfiguration I lost some lines in
/etc/apt/sources.list so I am not sure now what is the proper content of
it. In fact, I started to use squeeze a couple of years ago by
installing the first ten CDs of its release 6.0.1a and by time upgraded
to 6.0.10 and at
On 02/09/2016 05:04 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
End of Life on Valentines Day?
So, Valentines Day means death to many lifes?
A Valentines Day Massacre?
(Someone had to say it...)
:)
To prevent the 'end of life' I upgraded my old comp to wheezy some time
ago, despite being told to throw the
On 02/10/2016 10:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
so, are you prepared for valentine's day massacre?
Actually not: It is Wheezy (7.9) now, and I predict its valentine's day
massacre to approach in few years. Btw, when is the end of life for
Wheezy LTS?
or have you tried something
? For example, I am particularly interested in non-expensive
publishing houses that are willingly to publish books in lesser-used
disciplines, such as using Linux as a component of amateur radio
networks in various educational environments, ...
Best regards,
Miroslav Skoric
--
tutorial
On 11/05/2016 10:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please use 'reportbug kernel' to open a bug report and attach the file
to the report.
Done.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Bug#843399: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.2.0-4-486 version
3.2.81-2 freezes)
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 13:03:04 +
From: Debian Bug Tracking System <ow...@bugs.debian.org>
Reply-To: 843...@bugs.debian.org
To: Miroslav Skoric <sko...
On 05/31/2018 10:44 PM, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
Dear LTS Team
Your work is greatly appreciated! I would like to thank you all for your
effort. Without the LTS of wheezy it would have been a big pain for me.
Thanks a lot for helping that much.
Best regards, Adrian.
+1
M.S.
On 4/1/19 8:14 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
I do understand that re-adding an empty jessie-updates directory
will silence a lot of warnings from apt update, and thus would avoid
the questions from end users that I have seen in a lot of places,
but… I can't help thinking that although it is bad that
On 4/2/19 12:59 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Miroslav,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:53:50AM +0200, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
On 4/1/19 8:14 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
I do understand that re-adding an empty jessie-updates directory
will silence a lot of warnings from apt update, and thus would avoid
On 4/1/19 3:50 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
We have asked if it's going to be re-added, even if empty, to avoid people
using jessie from seeing errors when updateing package lists.
do I have to fill a bugreport to get it back?
Yes, do it please.
On 3/19/2020 11:00 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
One 'specific reason' to stay with an older release is that almost any new
release requires newer hardware (i.e. stops supporting some hardware that
was supported by the older release).
Linux upstream is super conservative with dropping
On 3/19/20 1:01 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
If you do not have a specific reason to stay on Debian 8 'jessie',
also consider upgrading to Debian 9 'stretch', and then from there to
Debian 10 'buster', which is the current stable release.
Hi,
One 'specific reason' to stay with an older
On 1/16/22 11:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2880-1debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/
On 1/17/22 11:44 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 16/01/2022 23:49, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
On 1/16/22 11:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
-
-
Debian LTS Advisory
On 1/16/22 11:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2880-1debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/
On 10/15/22 9:50 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On 14/10/2022 at, I wrote:
On 14/10/2022 at 11:08, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
Thank you for comment. Unfortunately, I do not have any machine
running bullseye or bookworm, so I cannot test it myself. Hope
someone will do.
I use thunderbird
On 10/16/22 3:10 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On 16/10/2022 at 13:28, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
On 10/15/22 9:50 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
As found on a newsgroup, setting mailnews.nntp.jsmodule=false fixed
the issue.
As I am not a programmer, where can I find & fix that line?
After a recent Thunderbird upgrade in Buster (from version 91-something
to 101-something, or like), it stopped handling newsgroups properly
(where the source is News Server (NNTP) on the same machine, and there
nothing was changed/upgraded).
To be precise, Thunderbird now seems downloading
/2022 15:17, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
After a recent Thunderbird upgrade in Buster (from version
91-something to 101-something, or like), it stopped handling
newsgroups properly (where the source is News Server (NNTP) on the
same machine, and there nothing was changed/upgraded).
To be precise
On 6/12/2023 11:38 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3452-1debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/
On 2/9/24 8:17 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
src:debian-security-support:
- #1061268: ending security support for chromium in bullseye
Hi,
Does it mean that chromium in bullseye will not be updated anymore?
Regards,
Misko
23 matches
Mail list logo
