Re: bullseye / libgdbm6:amd64 is a catastrophgy

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

this bug is not specific, the proble is that not all users report the
problems, just change the distro.. a normal tendency

in my case i downgrade to strecth and just works.. upgrading its not always
the right choose

its pretty unconfortable that an important bug will be not solved just cos
"its not popular" (only happened to one user) inclusivelly being
catastrophic!

sad

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:30 AM Roberto C. Sánchez 
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 11:24:18AM +0200, Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > AFAIK is bullseye not yet LTS-handled.
> >
> That is correct. This transition will happen in mid-2024.
>
> > Will LTS fixes important bugs, or only security fixes?
> >
> Generally speaking, the LTS team focuses only on fixing security issues.
>
> > I reported this:
> >
> >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043023
> >
> > I have a local work-around (keep the buster version), and the maintainer
> also
> > proposed another local work-around. Mine is running productively for a
> few
> > weeks now.
> >
> > Will LTS, when it takes hold of bullseye, fix this important bug?
> >
> This bug, while seriously impacting the usability of libgdbm6 for your
> specific use case, is hardly catastrophic. For that description to be
> appropriate it would be necessary for the package to be entirely
> non-functional for all use cases, breaking the functionality of other
> unrelated packages, and things of a similar nature.
>
> As the maintainer noted in his response to your bug report, you have
> several options available to you, including rebuilding the package
> locally, upgrading from bullseye to bookworm, and continuing to make use
> of the workaround.
>
> That said, if the bug is not fixed before bullseye makes the transition
> to LTS, then it almost certainly will not be fixed when bullseye is the
> responsibility of the LTS team. There are two main reasons for this.
>
> The first reason is that bugs of this nature (i.e., bugs that are not of
> a serious security nature, but which might still require a fix) are
> handled by the maintainer coordinating with the stable release managers
> (or oldstable release managers, in this case) to receive approval to
> upload a fixed package to be included in the next point release. Based
> on the response from the maintianer in your bug report, this does not
> appear to be in consideration. The second reason is that LTS (not being
> under the umbrella of the SRM/OSRM) does not receive point releases. The
> final point release of bullseye will happen just prior to the transition
> to LTS. Once that happens there will be no further point releseas, only
> security updates.
>
> You should not expect that this bug will be fixed in bullseye.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto
>
> --
> Roberto C. Sánchez
>
>

-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: packages from old security releases.

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

El sáb., 25 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 10:41, Raphael Hertzog
(hert...@debian.org) escribió:
> The reason why Wheezy Extended LTS packages are not in the Debian
> repositories is because Debian was not interested in keeping the wheezy

i'm talking about ARCHIVE not main! archive.debian.org


> repositories alive for longer.
>
> So Debian is not going to merge those packages.
>
> And while you can benefit from those packages freely, this is only
> possible because there are sponsors paying the work required to provide
> those updates.
>
> See https://deb.freexian.com/extended-lts/ for details.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
>
> Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
> Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
>

Re: packages from old security releases.

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

El vie., 24 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 03:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
(uh...@fantomas.sk) escribió:
> On 23.05.19 22:04, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> >all those response souns "it's not our problem, we dont care about that" ...
> of course. We are not paid, we are just members of mailing list.

ummm ok it's a important point !

> >important updates for wheeze never will be in archive. thanks for nothing!
> You are using Debian for free, aren't you? If not, ask those you pay to.
> Otherwise, don't blame Debian people for not providing more free services.

well seems the ExLTS don ask for money .. the packages are free
available and sources. so  merged in debian archive are not problem!

>
> >El jue., 23 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 16:49, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> >(uh...@fantomas.sk) escribió:
> >>
> >> >> On 22/05/2019 19:54, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> >> >>> currently still are security updats for jessie (debian LTS) and wheeze
> >> >>> (ExLTS) why those packages are not uploaded to archive debian ?
> >>
> >> >2019-05-22 13:58 GMT-04:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> >> >> jessie LTS is available from security.debian.org, just like other Debian
> >>
> >> On 22.05.19 22:46, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> >> >and not in archive? right?
> >>
> >> packages are moved to archive after they are removed from official mirrors.
> >>
> >> >> security updates for supported releases. wheezy ELTS is not officially 
> >> >> part
> >> >> of
> >> >> Debian, that's why the updates are not available from debian.org 
> >> >> machines,
> >> >> but
> >> >> you can still get them from the deb.freexian.com repository if you so
> >> >> choose.
> >> >i already know but why are not in archive!?
> >>
> >> the same reason as above and still they same reason Emilio said.
> >>
> >> >those packages are in good
> >> >shape and have important updates.. many many MANY hardware runs wheezy
> >> >and cannot be upgraded! due lack of support from recent "fashioned"
> >> >linux
> >>
> >> you can get them from freexian archive as Emilio said.
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
>

Re: packages from old security releases.

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

all those response souns "it's not our problem, we dont care about that" ...

important updates for wheeze never will be in archive. thanks for nothing!

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

El jue., 23 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 16:49, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
(uh...@fantomas.sk) escribió:
>
> >> On 22/05/2019 19:54, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> >>> currently still are security updats for jessie (debian LTS) and wheeze
> >>> (ExLTS) why those packages are not uploaded to archive debian ?
>
> >2019-05-22 13:58 GMT-04:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> >> jessie LTS is available from security.debian.org, just like other Debian
>
> On 22.05.19 22:46, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> >and not in archive? right?
>
> packages are moved to archive after they are removed from official mirrors.
>
> >> security updates for supported releases. wheezy ELTS is not officially part
> >> of
> >> Debian, that's why the updates are not available from debian.org machines,
> >> but
> >> you can still get them from the deb.freexian.com repository if you so
> >> choose.
> >i already know but why are not in archive!?
>
> the same reason as above and still they same reason Emilio said.
>
> >those packages are in good
> >shape and have important updates.. many many MANY hardware runs wheezy
> >and cannot be upgraded! due lack of support from recent "fashioned"
> >linux
>
> you can get them from freexian archive as Emilio said.
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
>

Re: packages from old security releases.

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2019-05-22 13:58 GMT-04:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> On 22/05/2019 19:54, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
>> currently still are security updats for jessie (debian LTS) and wheeze
>> (ExLTS) why those packages are not uploaded to archive debian ?
> jessie LTS is available from security.debian.org, just like other Debian
and not in archive? right?

> security updates for supported releases. wheezy ELTS is not officially part
> of
> Debian, that's why the updates are not available from debian.org machines,
> but
> you can still get them from the deb.freexian.com repository if you so
> choose.
i already know but why are not in archive!? those packages are in good
shape and have important updates.. many many MANY hardware runs wheezy
and cannot be upgraded! due lack of support from recent "fashioned"
linux

>
> Emilio
>
>>
>> those package are very important due many MANY MANY older hardware still
>> operative does not work with CURRENT FASHIONED linux
>>
>> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
>> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> El vie., 17 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 22:08, Abhijith PA
>> (abhij...@disroot.org)
>> escribió:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/05/19 7:48 pm, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> Abhijith PA:
>>>>> >From where we can find the security upload of packages in the old
>>>>> releases? I was searching for this[1] particular package but I
>>>>> couldn't
>>>>> find in the archive.debian.org[2].
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] -
>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg1.html
>>>>> [2] - http://archive.debian.org/debian/pool/main/j/jruby/
>>>>
>>>> I usually search them on https://snapshot.debian.org/:
>>>>
>>>> https://snapshot.debian.org/package/jruby/1.5.6-5%2Bdeb7u2/
>>>
>>> Thank you Jonas.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: packages from old security releases.

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

currently still are security updats for jessie (debian LTS) and wheeze
(ExLTS) why those packages are not uploaded to archive debian ?

by example i can find the updated kernel 3.16 for wheeze by ExLTS
collaboration but not in archive.debian.org neither in snapshot!

those package are very important due many MANY MANY older hardware still
operative does not work with CURRENT FASHIONED linux

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


El vie., 17 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 22:08, Abhijith PA (abhij...@disroot.org)
escribió:

>
>
> On 17/05/19 7:48 pm, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Abhijith PA:
> >> >From where we can find the security upload of packages in the old
> >> releases? I was searching for this[1] particular package but I couldn't
> >> find in the archive.debian.org[2].
> >>
> >> [1] -
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg1.html
> >> [2] - http://archive.debian.org/debian/pool/main/j/jruby/
> >
> > I usually search them on https://snapshot.debian.org/:
> >
> > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/jruby/1.5.6-5%2Bdeb7u2/
>
> Thank you Jonas.
>
>

Re: (E)LTS report for March

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

but seems wheeze are removed from security debian but still april 14 and
not present at archive debain


Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


El mié., 10 de abr. de 2019 a la(s) 03:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (
poch...@gmail.com) escribió:

> Hi,
>
> During the month of March, I spent 26 hours working on LTS on the following
> tasks:
>
>  libsndfile security update
>  prepared firmware-nonfree update
>  ntfs-3g security update
>  firefox-esr security updates
>  bash security update
>  ghostscript coordination
>  openjdk-7 security update
>  drupal7 security update
>  thunderbird security update
>  tzdata, libdatetime-timezone-perl updates
>  CVE triaging
>
> I also spent 16h on ELTS:
>
> - openjdk-7 security update
> - security tracker improvements (pre-commit hook)
> - libsndfile security update
> - firmware-nonfree update (not yet released)
> - ntfs-3g security update
> - bash security update
> - tiff3 review / feedback
> - tzdata, libdatetime-timezone-perl updates
> - CVE triaging
>
> Cheers,
> Emilio
>
>

Re: Wheezy ELTS?

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

was removed or not? are stil ELTS?

El lun., 15 de abr. de 2019 a la(s) 11:54, Микаел Бак (mikael@yandex.ru)
escribió:

> Hi list,
>
> Seems Wheezy has been removed from security.debian.org, but isn't added
> to the archive server.
>
> Is this usual, or is it an error?
>
> TIA,
> Mikael
>
>

Re: Bug#858973: wheezy-pu: package ejabberd/2.1.10-4+deb7u2

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

does any other tested the pckage with real production clients?

i could test that but its better upgrade event use a unmantained package..

some times ago i try to mantain that package but the debian process are a
great obstacle!

today i used my own package and made track of the debian ...

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-04-16 14:43 GMT-04:00 Markus Raab :

> Hello,
>
> Thanks for still maintaining wheezy.
>
> This security fix broke the N900 jabber (xmpp) client (included in Maemo).
>
> With 2.1.10-4+deb7u1 the N900 xmpp client was connecting without troubles,
> since 2.1.10-4+deb7u2 it immediately fails with a "network error".
>
> I only wanted to mention the bug for reference, it is much more likely that
> the problem is the unmaintained N900 xmpp client, and not the security fix.
>
> best regards,
> Markus
>
>

Re: squeeze update of gtk+2.0?

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

i can test the uploads, what must be doit? how, i'm using squeze on
many of my hardware due wheeze and jeesie are very slowly for the
older hardware

2016-02-23 18:38 GMT-04:30, Michael Biebl :
> Am 23.02.2016 um 23:59 schrieb Santiago Ruano Rincón:
>> Hello dear maintainer(s),
>>
>> the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
>> currently open in the Squeeze version of gtk+2.0 and relate to
>> gdk-pixbuf:
>> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/gtk+2.0
>>
>> A user have noticed me about these issues, originally filed against, and
>> I have already prepared a package (debdiff attached), backporting the
>> patches from wheezy's gdk-pixbuf. Could you please take a look on it?
>> Would you like to finish the upload and prepared the DLA or do you want
>> me to go ahead?
>
> I stopped using squeeze a long time ago, so I won't be doing any uploads
> for it.
> I would prefer someone doing the upload who actually tests it (under
> squeeze).
>
> Regards,
> Michael
> --
> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
> universe are pointed away from Earth?
>
>


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Offering mysql-5.5 as an option in squeeze-lts

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

many packages are compile linket around mysql 5.1 api and mysql 5.5
changes a little, this i thing may cause some problems

if this happened some packages must be also backported/updated

same behavior with php 5.3 vs 5.4
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


2015-09-29 5:36 GMT-04:30 Raphael Hertzog :
> Hello,
>
> currently we are shipping mysql-5.1 which is no longer supported upstream
> and which might have multiple unfixed vulnerabilities (Oracle doesn't
> disclose enough details to either verify it or fix them).
>
> We should really offer squeeze users to switch to a supported version
> of mysql and that would be version 5.5.
>
> Who would like to drive this forward?
>
> As a first step, I would suggest that we backport 5.5.44-0+deb7u1
> for squeeze and we drop the unversioned packages: libmysqld-pic,
> libmysqld-dev, libmysqlclient-dev, mysql-common, mysql-server,
> mysql-client.
>
> The goal is to not rebuild applications, they would continue
> to use the old libmysqlclient16 but would connect to the 5.5
> server.
>
> For mysql-common, it might be necessary to build it from mysql-5.5
> but we should ensure it also works with mysql-5.1...
>
> And then we perform some test upgrades, and some application tests, and
> try to smooth the rough edges. When we're happy we send out a DLA
> indicating that mysql-5.1 is EOL but that they can switch to mysql-5.5
> if they desire (although it requires a manual upgrade).
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
>
> Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
> Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
>

Re: About the security issues affecting dcraw/ufraw/libraw/rawtherapee/rawstudio/exactimage/freeimage in Squeeze

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

i cannot see recent activity arount those issues ..

if i have some dsc's in another reos can be usefully for sponsored ?
and uploaded or used for  squeeze-lts?
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


2015-05-26 11:20 GMT-04:30 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
 Hello dear maintainer(s),

 the Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your
 package in Squeeze:
 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-3885

 We decided that we would not prepare a squeeze security update (usually
 because the security impact is low and that we concentrate our limited
 resources on higher severity issues and on the most widely used packages).
 That said the squeeze users would most certainly benefit from a fixed
 package.

 If you want to work on such an update, you're welcome to do so. Please
 try to follow the workflow we have defined here:
 http://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development

 If that workflow is a burden to you, feel free to just prepare an
 updated source package and send it to debian-lts@lists.debian.org
 (via a debdiff, or with an URL pointing to the the source package,
 or even with a pointer to your packaging repository), and the members
 of the LTS team will take care of the rest. However please make sure to
 submit a tested package.

 Thank you very much.

 Raphaël Hertzog,
   on behalf of the Debian LTS team.
 --
 Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

 Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
 Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150526155045.ga6...@home.ouaza.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CALci+FQdo7sxC=M5qPZQCT=jsnec3vczqkqmkzf5phlblod...@mail.gmail.com

Re: About the security issues affecting dcraw/ufraw/libraw/rawtherapee/rawstudio/exactimage/freeimage in Squeeze

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

but exactimage its not the only affected, in fact u'r upload its the
only activity in those issues of the CVE-2015-3885
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


2015-06-03 10:16 GMT-04:30 Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org:
 On Wednesday 03 June 2015 10:04:19 PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
 i cannot see recent activity arount those issues ..

 Here are my uploads:

 https://tracker.debian.org/news/686774 (unstable)
 https://tracker.debian.org/news/687131 (squeeze-lts)
 https://tracker.debian.org/news/687239 (jessie)
 https://tracker.debian.org/news/687578 (wheezy)

 Are you expecting more activity for exactimage?

 Kind regards,
 Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CALci+FSDfJc+-ohYjckooX6NyCJ7yZZUDEpjO=fot5nomfi...@mail.gmail.com

Re: About the security issues affecting dcraw/ufraw/libraw/rawtherapee/rawstudio/exactimage/freeimage in Squeeze

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

there's too many task in my job, and the reading are heavy.. if i
could send only the patchs of the bug only..?
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


2015-06-03 10:54 GMT-04:30 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:
 On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
 i cannot see recent activity arount those issues ..

 if i have some dsc's in another reos can be usefully for sponsored ?
 and uploaded or used for  squeeze-lts?

 If you want to contribute fixes for those issues, you should follow
 the usual process described here:
 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development

 Part of this is to prepare a fixed source package (.dsc) and to test
 the resulting binary packages. Once this is done you can send the
 debdiff between the current version of the source package and the
 version that you prepared to this list (and possibly also to the
 associated bug report).

 Others can then pick up the administrative work of reviewing the package,
 uploading the package and sending the DLA.


 Cheers,
 --
 Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

 Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
 Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CALci+FRRUKV=PttcCi0bghvAzBjQniN8XMFrK1=iu9fS=pi...@mail.gmail.com

Re: Debian squeeze LTS, a last release

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

so then now the lts updates will be until? if the long time of the lts
packages depends on collaboration, how i can participe without much reading
long manuals? the actual workflow manual of the debian lts are huge if we
need to understand the new package mantainer manuals, we have job and
familly also to pay attention..

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2015-05-27 3:29 GMT-04:30 Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com:

 On 27/05/2015, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
  Hello,
 
  On Tue, 26 May 2015, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
  There's so many packages in LST now, and squeeze are good choice for
  servers.. and many many older desktop hardware that jesee or wheeze does
  not able to run..
 
  Debian team will be made a lasted release of squeeze withj the lts
  updates
  included?
 
  There are no such plans, sorry. You will continue to have to apply
  all updates from squeeze-lts after having installed a fresh squeeze
  server.
 
  Cheers,
  --
  Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
 

 My understanding is that, in the installation procedure for any Debian
 system, the first thing to do after the system installation is
 completed, is to update the system.

 Therefore, as I have just done a new Debian 6 installation, the
 procedure that I followed, is this;

 1. Install Debian 6 system (I used CD1 of the Debian Linux 6.0.7 set)
 2. edit /etc/apt/sources.list, to change the mirrors to the
 recommended mirrors for Debian 6 LTS
 3. run
 apt-get update
 , followed by
 apt-get upgrade
 (although, this, in itself, was a problem, due to some entries in the
 changelog, for wget and postgresql, that caused the procedure to hang,
 and needed a workaround)
 4. install any additional, wanted packages

 Thus, whilst an LTS set of iso images may not be available, the
 procedure above, is simple enough, and, does not take any extra time
 (apart from editing the /etc/apt/sources.list file, which is only a
 few minutes), over what a normal installation procedure would involve
 (apart from the problem with the changelog causing the procedure to
 hang).

 I suggest that, therefore, this solves the problem.

 --
 Bret Busby
 Armadale
 West Australia
 ..

 So once you do know what the question actually is,
  you'll know what the answer means.
 - Deep Thought,
  Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
  The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
  A Trilogy In Four Parts,
  written by Douglas Adams,
  published by Pan Books, 1992

 


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive:
 https://lists.debian.org/cacx6j8nnw_-rvrv0ptdrb23sury4ax4mxu7u3ejk20nk+f...@mail.gmail.com

Debian squeeze LTS, a last release

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

There's so many packages in LST now, and squeeze are good choice for
servers.. and many many older desktop hardware that jesee or wheeze does
not able to run..

Debian team will be made a lasted release of squeeze withj the lts updates
included?

Currently a dual core with 1G ram are a very dificul to move in good
performance for wheeze or jeesse.. with these machines only squeeze have
good performance in desktops..

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: squeeze update of mercurial?

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

the mercurial version of squeeze has those issues open? in wich version of
debian mercurial packages are resolved?

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2015-05-11 14:12 GMT-04:30 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org:

 Hello dear maintainer(s),

 the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
 currently open in the Squeeze version of mercurial:
 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-9462
 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-9390 (optional, is
 tagged no-dsa)

 Would you like to take care of this yourself? We are still understaffed so
 any help is always highly appreciated.

 If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined here:
 http://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development

 If that workflow is a burden to you, feel free to just prepare an
 updated source package and send it to debian-lts@lists.debian.org
 (via a debdiff, or with an URL pointing to the the source package,
 or even with a pointer to your packaging repository), and the members
 of the LTS team will take care of the rest. Indicate clearly whether you
 have tested the updated package or not.

 If you don't want to take care of this update, it's not a problem, we
 will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would
 like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets released.

 Thank you very much.

 Raphaël Hertzog,
   on behalf of the Debian LTS team.

 PS: A member of the LTS team might start working on this update at
 any point in time. You can verify whether someone is registered
 on this update in this file:

 https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-testing/data/dla-needed.txt?view=markup
 --
 Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

 Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
 Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150511184223.ga29...@home.ouaza.com

Re: Bug#773834: Preparing a release for stable and lts

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

I want a LST release of squeeze discs TOO! if possible!

Currently theres problem in squeeze with Xorg and DRI, the backports
packages used DRI 2 in most modules, but only recen itel and noveau
modules uses DRI2, te rest of itel, ati and savage/chrome/via uses
DRI1, so GLX and some graphics support are broken!

Why not a kertnel with DRI 1 support for current squeeze? jessie does
not run on a wide range of older pc, only the most recent (if u
installed a web broser, and the libreoffice, that's all, all get
slower)

I used debian squeeze due are most faster and stable rather than
wheeze or jeesie

I can apport time and bug hunter for squeeze backports..

-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/calci+fslgbqxqqfu4jx+khqofbydutvu7enofn0tx6m+ysk...@mail.gmail.com