Re: Bug#961654: buster-pu: package bzip2/1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1

2022-09-16 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 16/09/22 a las 09:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: > Hi Santiago, > > On 15/09/2022 09:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 14/09/2022 15:42, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > > El 14/09/22 a las 13:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: > > > > On 13/

Re: Bug#961654: buster-pu: package bzip2/1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1

2022-09-14 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 14/09/22 a las 13:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: > On 13/09/2022 16:46, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > IIUC this is about fixing 2 non-security bugs, that were introduced > > prior to buster's initial release. > > > > I personally don't think this fits the LTS project scope. > >

Re: Bug#961654: buster-pu: package bzip2/1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1

2022-09-13 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, El 10/09/22 a las 19:11, Adam D. Barratt escribió: > On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 11:56 +0200, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > Since 1.0.6-9, bzip2 was built without the -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > > CPPFLAG, and so it's not able to handle > 2GB files in 32-bit archs. > > See ht

My Debian LTS activities in November 2018

2018-12-07 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, Last November I spent 12 hours on Debian LTS under the Freexian umbrella. I continued the work on qemu and released [DLA-1599-1]. Thanks to Lucas and Hugo for reviewing and testing! [DLA-1599-1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00038.html I am still carrying six hours

Re: QEMU in Jessie: call for testers

2018-11-24 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 24/11/18 a las 10:46, Hugo Lefeuvre escribió: > > > > > I have prepared a preliminary package for qemu to fix most of > > > > > currently > > > > > open CVEs (among those that have a patch or have been fixed in > > > > > stretch). > > > > > I would be glad if someone could give it a try. It is

QEMU in Jessie: call for testers

2018-11-21 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi there, I have prepared a preliminary package for qemu to fix most of currently open CVEs (among those that have a patch or have been fixed in stretch). I would be glad if someone could give it a try. It is found in the usual place: deb https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-je

Re: unclaiming packages claimed for 3 weeks or more (Re: november report)

2018-11-20 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, El 20/11/18 a las 16:17, Holger Levsen escribió: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:50:16PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > Automatic unclaimer > > --- > > > > After an internal discussion about work procedures, a friend pointed me > > at the [don't lick the cookie][6] ar

My Debian LTS activities in October 2018

2018-11-09 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, In October 2018 I had available 28 hours --that I am carrying from previous months-- to work on Debian LTS under the Freexian umbrella. I spent ten of them in the following: * dnsruby: finished the work and released [DLA 1542-1]. * clamav: released [DLA 1553-1] to update the package to the ne

Re: My Debian LTS activities in September 2018

2018-10-17 Thread Santiago R.R.
(Resending since archive was not working. Sorry for the noise) El 10/10/18 a las 09:06, Santiago R.R. escribió: > Hi, > > The last month of September I spent four hours only from the 32 I had > available to work on Debian LTS under the Freexian initiative: > > * openssh: re

My Debian LTS activities in September 2018

2018-10-10 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, The last month of September I spent four hours only from the 32 I had available to work on Debian LTS under the Freexian initiative: * openssh: released [DLA 1500-2] to fix a regression from my previous upload. Thanks to Salvatore. * Checked for DNS(SEC)-related packages that required to be

My Debian LTS activities in August 2018

2018-09-10 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, Last August I had 20 available hours to work on Debian LTS under the Freexian initiave, but I was only able to spend eight of them: * clamav: released [DLA 1461-1](https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00020.html) that packages the new upstream release and fixes two CVEs.

Bug#907887: dnsmasq: Update root DNSSEC trust anchor in stretch and jessie

2018-09-03 Thread Santiago R.R.
Source: dnsmasq Version: 2.72-3+deb8u2 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi Simon, The DNS Root Key Signing Key (KSK) Rollover is scheduled for 11 October 2018 [1]. After this date, DNS resolvers will need to have the new key (KSK-2017) to perform DNSSEC validation. [1] https://www.icann.org/news/

My Debian LTS activities in July 2018

2018-08-10 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, Last July I spent the 17.5 I had available to work on Debian LTS under the Freexian initiative. I finished the work on, and released the DLA of: * ruby2.1: DLA 1421-1 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00012.html * libidn: DLA 1447-1 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts

Re: src:wpa overlap in Debian LTS?\

2018-08-10 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 10/08/18 a las 10:20, Chris Lamb escribió: > Holger Levsen wrote: > > […] > > of that page and then I found the entry where it describes how to claim > > a DLA, which I did, thinking this would be visible enough (and maybe > > automatically put an entry into dla-needed.txt.) > > It would not b

Re: Jessie update of clamav?

2018-07-20 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 19/07/18 a las 20:59, Mike Gabriel escribió: > Hi all, > > On Do 19 Jul 2018 21:18:13 CEST, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > On 2018-07-19 17:06:30 [+0200], Mike Gabriel wrote: > > > The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > > > currently open in the Jessie v

My Debian LTS activities in June 2018

2018-07-11 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, Sorry for being late with my report. I had available 15 hours in total to work on Debian LTS under the Freexian initiative, but I was only able to spend 5.5 of them. I started working on qemu, which has a long list of open issues, and I am continuing the work this month. Thanks for using and

qemu in jessie

2018-06-30 Thread Santiago R.R.
Dear security team, I am working on the jessie package of qemu (the first time I work on it), and I notice it hasn't been updated in jessie since May 2017. There were various stretch updates since then, and I wonder if the reason why jessie wasn't updated was mainly lack of time/resources, or is t

My Debian LTS activities in May 2018

2018-06-10 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, The last month of May, Freexian assigned me eight hours to work on Debian LTS, but I was able to use only one. During that hour, I started to work on the libidn upload for jessie (and stretch). I am carrying to this month the remaining hours. I hope I will be able to spend them. Thanks for us

My Debian LTS activities in April 2018

2018-05-09 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, On April 2018 I got assigned eight hours to work on Debian LTS by the Freexian initiative. It was more ruby fun: * After having some feedback (thanks to Gabriel Filion!), I finished the work on ruby1.9.1 and issued [DLA 1358-1]. * Triaged missing issues in ruby1.8, and issued the correspond

Re: wheezy-security (LTS) libclamav7's version is newer than jessie's

2018-05-04 Thread Santiago R.R.
posed-updates and will only be in the main > > > repository after the next (final?) point release. > > On 04.05.18 09:42, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > Just FTR, 0.99.4+dfsg-1+deb8u1 was also in proposed updates: > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/937695/accepted-clamav-0994dfsg-1

Re: wheezy-security (LTS) libclamav7's version is newer than jessie's

2018-05-04 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 04/05/18 a las 09:20, Raphael Hertzog escribió: > Hello Marc, > > On Thu, 03 May 2018, Marc SCHAEFER wrote: > > Probably that a downgrade of the clamav suite would solve the problem; > > however > > there is something wrong in the coherency between wheezy LTS and jessie, > > don't > > you thi

Re: ruby1.9.1 test packages for wheezy

2018-04-25 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 24/04/18 a las 11:40, Gabriel Filion escribió: > On 2018-04-22 04:20 PM, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > El 19/04/18 a las 18:07, Gabriel Filion escribió: > >> Hi there, > >> > >> I've run a test on our setup here after getting a poke from Antoine. > &g

Re: ruby1.9.1 test packages for wheezy

2018-04-22 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 19/04/18 a las 18:07, Gabriel Filion escribió: > Hi there, > > I've run a test on our setup here after getting a poke from Antoine. > > I'm not sure that the test is actually conclusive of anything though.. > basically, it still works for us but that's probably because of how > things are setu

Re: ruby1.9.1 test packages for wheezy

2018-04-18 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 18/04/18 a las 09:14, Antoine Beaupré escribió: > On 2018-04-18 12:47:52, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > Hi Antoine! > > > > El 17/04/18 a las 11:58, Antoine Beaupré escribió: > >> Also, after talking with my old colleagues, I just realized that they > >> mi

Re: ruby1.9.1 test packages for wheezy

2018-04-18 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi Antoine! El 17/04/18 a las 11:58, Antoine Beaupré escribió: > Also, after talking with my old colleagues, I just realized that they > might be using Ruby 1.8 and not 1.9.1. It seems we have triaged those > out of the picture, but maybe all 1.8 packages are affected by a bunch > of those issues

ruby1.9.1 test packages for wheezy

2018-04-10 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, I have uploaded test packages of ruby1.9.1 to my personal repo: deb https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-wheezy-security/ deb-src https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-wheezy-security/ It would be great to have feedback from it, especially because: This p

Re: rubygems / CVE-2018-1000074

2018-04-10 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 10/04/18 a las 17:59, Brian May escribió: > Hello Santiago, > > Just wondering if there was any reason for not fixing CVE-2018-174 > in DLA 1336-1? Hi Brian, As I said in a previous mail, I think it is a not-so-severe issue (the user has to run the `gem owner` command for being exploitabl

My Debian LTS activities in March 2018

2018-04-10 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, Last month of March, I had 12 hours to spend in the Debian LTS project under the Freexian umbrella. This is what I did: * Finished the work about clamav * curl: I released [DLA 1309-1] that fixed CVE-2018-1000120, CVE-2018-1000121 and CVE-2018-1000122. * jruby, rubygems and ruby1.9.1: I upl

Re: CVE-2018-1000074: rubygems, jruby & ruby1.9.11

2018-04-02 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 02/04/18 a las 10:13, Chris Lamb escribió: > Hi Santiago, > > > I have been unable to confirm the versions of these packages are > > affected by CVE-2018-174 and CVE-2018-179 > > re. CVE-2018-174, it seems fairly clear. For example, here is jruby's > lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems

Re: CVE-2018-1000074: rubygems, jruby & ruby1.9.11

2018-04-02 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi Chris, El 02/04/18 a las 08:55, Chris Lamb escribió: > Hi Santiago, > > I just triaged rubygems & jruby for wheezy re. CVE-2018-174 and > noticed that ruby1.9.1 is also vulnerable. You still have this latter > package reserved in dla-needed.txt since March 18th. I have been unable to conf

Re: Clamav test packages for wheezy

2018-03-14 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 13/03/18 a las 21:03, Hugo Lefeuvre escribió: > Hi Santiago, > > I've installed your test packages in a wheezy vm and tested the > following features: > > * Install: OK > * Updating virus definitions: OK (everything was up to date, which is > the expected behavior after an update I guess) >

Clamav test packages for wheezy

2018-03-13 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, I have prepared test packages of clamav, available at: deb https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-wheezy-security/ deb-src https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-wheezy-security/ Feedback is always welcome! -- Santiago signature.asc Description: PGP sign

My Debian LTS activities in February 2018

2018-03-09 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, In the previous month I resumed my activities in the LTS Team, under the Freexian initiative. I got assigned eight hours. I was finally able to work six and I am carrying the rest for this month. * suricata: I checked CVE-2018-6794, but after reproducing it, I chose to follow security-team

Re: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Wheezy update of clamav?

2018-03-09 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, El 02/03/18 a las 23:36, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior escribió: > On 2018-03-02 02:19:04 [+], Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Conveniently, upstream just released 0.99.4 that addresses this and some > > other issues. I'd suggest you let us get that into stable/oldstable first. > > I will try to

Re: upload leptonlib

2018-02-27 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 26/02/18 a las 10:55, Jeff Breidenbach escribió: > >Was upstream's position also to remove those binaries? > > Yes. > > >Upstream was unable to provide a patch? > > Yes. Upstream decided that it was not worth the time to make a patch. > > Leptonica is a large image processing library. It als

Re: upload leptonlib

2018-02-23 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 23/02/18 a las 10:08, Jeff Breidenbach escribió: > >So these files should be also removed from the package in wheezy and jessie? > > Yes. Sorry if my previous message was maybe too brief. It is not common to remove a file from the packages of a released debian suite. I find it surprising that

Re: upload leptonlib

2018-02-23 Thread Santiago R.R.
Security team: sorry for the lack of context in the message. Please see https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2018/02/msg00054.html and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830660 El 22/02/18 a las 22:35, Jeff Breidenbach escribió: >These binaries were removed in #830660. >>$ st

Re: [Secure-testing-commits] [Git][security-tracker-team/security-tracker][master] Add librsvg to dla-needed.txt

2018-02-11 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 11/02/18 a las 18:16, Markus Koschany escribió: > Markus Koschany pushed to branch master at Debian Security Tracker / > security-tracker > > Commits: > > • f8aa9d3d > by Markus Koschany at 2018-02-11T19:16:41+01:00 > > Add librsvg to dla-needed.txt > Hi Markus, The information I

Re: asterisk support

2016-11-23 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, El 23/11/16 a las 18:02, Brian May escribió: > Hello, > > I noticed that Asterisk was marked EOL for Debian squeeze; just wondered > what the reasons were, and if these reasons apply to wheezy? Not sure about the reasons for squeeze, but Thorsten has already handled one upload for wheezy. Yo

My Debian LTS activities in July 2016

2016-08-17 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, For July 2016, I had in total 25.95 paid hours available (including those spare from previous months) to work on Debian LTS via the Freexian umbrella. However, I was only able to use 14. This is partially what I have done: * Helped to test the apache2 package prepared and uploaded by Salvator

Re: Wheezy and jessie updates of lighttpd

2016-08-02 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 02/08/16 a las 10:11, Sébastien Delafond escribió: > On Aug/01, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > Please, find attached debdiffs to mitigate this in wheezy (that I plan > > to upload) and jessie. I have tested it with a python cgi taken from > > httpoxy's PoCs, and it seems t

Wheezy and jessie updates of lighttpd

2016-08-01 Thread Santiago R.R.
18:01:58.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +lighttpd (1.4.31-4+deb7u5~1) santiago-wheezy; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload by the Debian LTS Team. + * Fix CVE-2016-1000212: Mitigate HTTPoxy vulnerability. + * Add buffer_is_equal_caseless_string.patch + * Add mitigate-httpoxy-779c133c16f9af168b0

Debconf16 LTS BoF - Summary

2016-07-28 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, This is a summary of the Debian LTS BoF, held during Debconf 16. Full gobby text can be found at https://gobby.debian.org/export/debconf16/bof/debian-lts I have also added the TODO items to https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/TODO 1. Process to dispatch frontdesk duties The last manual and auto-

MySQL-5.5 packages to test

2016-07-27 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi there, A new mysql-5.5 package from last upstream release is available for test at my personal repository: deb https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-wheezy/ deb-src https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-wheezy/ Any feedback is always welcome. Cheers, Santiago

My Debian LTS activities in February 2016

2016-03-05 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hello everybody, From the 13.50 hours that I had available in the last February, sponsored through Freexian, I spent twelve on the following: * cpio: I uploaded the package that fixes CVE-2016-2037. See [DLA 415-1](https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2016/02/msg7.html). * gtk+2.0: