Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-12 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Markus, > I'm fine with uploading tomorrow. Just send me your debdiff and I will > incorporate your changes. You can find the debdiff for CVE-2019-9956, CVE-2019-11598, CVE-2019-11597 and CVE-2019-10650 in attachement, along with appropriate DLA text entries. I briefly thought of adding

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-12 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
> Great! I have found potential issues in upstream's patch for CVE-2019-11598 > and would maybe wait a little bit for his answer (more info in dla-needed). > > If he takes too long, we can just as well remove this patch from the update > and mark it postponed until upstream addresses these

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-11 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
> > I have prepared an update addressing CVE-2019-9956, CVE-2019-10650, > > CVE-2019-11598 and CVE-2019-11597. I'm currently testing it. Still OK to > > upload during the week-end? > > I'm fine with uploading tomorrow. Just send me your debdiff and I will > incorporate your changes. Great! I

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-11 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Hugo, Am 11.05.19 um 09:16 schrieb Hugo Lefeuvre: > Hi Markus, > >>> Good idea. I plan to work on CVE-2019-9956, CVE-2019-10650 and possibly >>> CVE-2019-11598. Do you think an upload ~ next week-end would be feasible >>> for you? >> >> Sure, that should be feasible. > > I have prepared an

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-11 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Markus, > > Good idea. I plan to work on CVE-2019-9956, CVE-2019-10650 and possibly > > CVE-2019-11598. Do you think an upload ~ next week-end would be feasible > > for you? > > Sure, that should be feasible. I have prepared an update addressing CVE-2019-9956, CVE-2019-10650, CVE-2019-11598

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-05 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 05.05.19 um 15:01 schrieb Hugo Lefeuvre: [...] > Good idea. I plan to work on CVE-2019-9956, CVE-2019-10650 and possibly > CVE-2019-11598. Do you think an upload ~ next week-end would be feasible > for you? > > cheers, > Hugo Sure, that should be feasible. Cheers, Markus signature.asc

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-05 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Markus, > We contacted the security team directly without CCing the lts mailing > list. However they didn't reply to us. OK, Roberto forwarded the discussion to me. > > I think the security team opted for targeted fixes in the imagemagick case, > > at least for CVE-2019-9956 (claims remote

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-05 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Roberto, > > Did you CC debian-lts? I can't find the e-mail you're referring to :) > > > I did not. In a few minutes I will bounce you the message from that > discussion (there are 5 or 6). I won't bounce them to the list, though, > as I suspect they will get flagged as spam. Thanks for

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-05 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 05.05.19 um 14:34 schrieb Hugo Lefeuvre: > Hi Markus and Roberto, > > I just had a look at imagemagick in jessie and did some quick triage. > > I saw the following notes in dla-needed: > > NOTE: 20190408: Still waiting on security team response to inquiries > from (apo) and

Re: dla-needed/imagemagick entry

2019-05-05 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
Hi Hugo, On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:34:34PM +0200, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > Hi Markus and Roberto, > > I just had a look at imagemagick in jessie and did some quick triage. > > I saw the following notes in dla-needed: > > NOTE: 20190408: Still waiting on security team response to inquiries >