On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 11:23, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> >> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
> >
> > As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a
> > 0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to wheezy-b
On 09.12.2016 11:23, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
>> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
>
> As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a
> 0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to wheezy-backports.
>
> Enjoy :)
>
Hi,
I cannot really recommend
Hi Chris,
Am 09.12.2016 um 11:23 schrieb Chris Lamb:
> Hi Christoph,
>
>> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
>
> As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a
> 0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to wheezy-backports.
>
Thanks a lot.
Christoph
--
Hi Christoph,
> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a
0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to wheezy-backports.
Enjoy :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
Hi,
will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5.
Regards
Christoph
Am 08.12.2016 um 20:01 schrieb Chris Lamb:
> Package: roundcube
> Version: 0.7.2-9+deb7u5
> Debian Bug : 847287
>
> It was discovered that there was a vulnerability where a remote user