Am 01.03.2016 um 13:16 schrieb Bonno Bloksma (list account):
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-02-29 20:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
>>> wheezy.
>>
>> I think that (what you wrote ealier) would be a sensible recommendation to
>> make.
>>
>> We
Hi,
On 2016-02-29 20:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
>> wheezy.
>
> I think that (what you wrote ealier) would be a sensible recommendation to
> make.
>
> We're only keeping Wheezy around for system setups that were established
>
Hi,
On Montag, 29. Februar 2016, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > If it helps I could remove the "Debian 7 Wheezy" part and write
> > "we recommend that you upgrade your systems".
> That fully resolves the issue I was having with the text.
agreed & please post this! & thanks! :-)
cheers,
Holger
Hi Markus,
On 29-02-16 21:56, Markus Koschany wrote:
> If it helps I could remove the "Debian 7 Wheezy" part and write
> "we recommend that you upgrade your systems".
That fully resolves the issue I was having with the text.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:27 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On 29-02-16 20:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> you only can upgrade to wheezy directly. upgrade accross versions is not
>> supported.
>
> I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
> wheezy.
Hi Paul,
t
On 2016-02-29 20:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
wheezy.
I think that (what you wrote ealier) would be a sensible recommendation
to make.
We're only keeping Wheezy around for system setups that were established
while Wheezy was s
Hi Markus,
On 29-02-16 20:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> you only can upgrade to wheezy directly. upgrade accross versions is not
> supported.
I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
wheezy.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 29-02-16 12:35, Markus Koschany wrote:
We recommend that you upgrade your systems to Debian 7 "Wheezy".
On 29.02.16 19:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
/me wonders, do we really recommend that? I would say we recommend our
users to upgrade to the current stable (via Wheezy), no? And wheezy-lts
is the
Hi Markus,
On 29-02-16 12:35, Markus Koschany wrote:
> We recommend that you upgrade your systems to Debian 7 "Wheezy".
/me wonders, do we really recommend that? I would say we recommend our
users to upgrade to the current stable (via Wheezy), no? And wheezy-lts
is there for those that can't or w
Am 28.02.2016 um 18:12 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Sonntag, 28. Februar 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I have updated https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using to prepare for the
>> switch to Wheezy LTS. What do you think about sending an EOL
>> announcement to debian-lts-announce on March
Hi Markus,
On Sonntag, 28. Februar 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I have updated https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using to prepare for the
> switch to Wheezy LTS. What do you think about sending an EOL
> announcement to debian-lts-announce on March 1st? We could simply reuse
> the official NEWS post [1
Hi all,
I have updated https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using to prepare for the
switch to Wheezy LTS. What do you think about sending an EOL
announcement to debian-lts-announce on March 1st? We could simply reuse
the official NEWS post [1] and would probably reach those people who
normally don't read
12 matches
Mail list logo
