Hi,
On Montag, 6. Juli 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > is anybody working on LTS really using pure svn instead of git-svn? I
> > somewhat
> > doubt it...
> I am. Most commits need to be pushed immediately anyway, right?
well, for LTS probably yes, though I still prefer being able to use "git log"
On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 10:58 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Freitag, 3. Juli 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > It displays a colorful warning and offers to commit only the
> > modified file (if you use svn, if you use git-svn like me, you're
> on your
> > own).
>
> is anybody working on
Hi,
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I just looked at the patch and played with it a little.
>
> Comments:
>
> o We maybe want to do an "svn update" before manipulating data/DLA/list
> and data/dla-needed.txt file? Probably a minor thing, but it svn
> updating could
> be hand
HI Raphael,
On Sa 04 Jul 2015 08:25:27 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 04 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>It displays a colorful warning and offers to commit only the
>modified file (if you use svn, if you use git-svn like me, you're on your
>own).
Why not also commit the changes to
Hi,
On Freitag, 3. Juli 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It displays a colorful warning and offers to commit only the
> modified file (if you use svn, if you use git-svn like me, you're on your
> own).
is anybody working on LTS really using pure svn instead of git-svn? I somewhat
doubt it...
che
Hi,
On Sat, 04 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >It displays a colorful warning and offers to commit only the
> >modified file (if you use svn, if you use git-svn like me, you're on your
> >own).
>
> Why not also commit the changes to the dla-needed.txt file?
I just forgot about it. You're right
Hi Raphael,
On Fr 03 Jul 2015 21:19:14 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:
I just discussed this with Moritz Mühlenhoff on #debian-security. His
request is to leave all genDSA specific stuff in the genD{S,L}A script
untouched.
What about the attached patch
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:19:14PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > I just discussed this with Moritz Mühlenhoff on #debian-security. His
> > request is to leave all genDSA specific stuff in the genD{S,L}A script
> > untouched.
>
> What about the attache
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I just discussed this with Moritz Mühlenhoff on #debian-security. His
> request is to leave all genDSA specific stuff in the genD{S,L}A script
> untouched.
What about the attached patch ?
It displays a colorful warning and offers to commit only the
modif
Hi all,
On Fr 03 Jul 2015 13:49:29 CEST, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Can this svn commit for the DLA number not be done within bin/genDLA ?
Well... Actually it could. Good point. Let me get some feedback from
the security team as genDLA is a symlink to genDSA which is the main
tool used by the s
10 matches
Mail list logo
