Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 10:58 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Freitag, 3. Juli 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote: It displays a colorful warning and offers to commit only the modified file (if you use svn, if you use git-svn like me, you're on your own). is anybody working on LTS really

Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 05 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: I just looked at the patch and played with it a little. Comments: o We maybe want to do an svn update before manipulating data/DLA/list and data/dla-needed.txt file? Probably a minor thing, but it svn updating could be handeled by

Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 6. Juli 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote: is anybody working on LTS really using pure svn instead of git-svn? I somewhat doubt it... I am. Most commits need to be pushed immediately anyway, right? well, for LTS probably yes, though I still prefer being able to use git log, git

Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-05 Thread Mike Gabriel
HI Raphael, On Sa 04 Jul 2015 08:25:27 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hi, On Sat, 04 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: It displays a colorful warning and offers to commit only the modified file (if you use svn, if you use git-svn like me, you're on your own). Why not also commit the changes to

bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-03 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi all, On Fr 03 Jul 2015 13:49:29 CEST, Mike Gabriel wrote: Can this svn commit for the DLA number not be done within bin/genDLA ? Well... Actually it could. Good point. Let me get some feedback from the security team as genDLA is a symlink to genDSA which is the main tool used by the

Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-03 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Raphael, On Fr 03 Jul 2015 21:19:14 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 03 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: I just discussed this with Moritz Mühlenhoff on #debian-security. His request is to leave all genDSA specific stuff in the genD{S,L}A script untouched. What about the attached patch

Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-03 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:19:14PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 03 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: I just discussed this with Moritz Mühlenhoff on #debian-security. His request is to leave all genDSA specific stuff in the genD{S,L}A script untouched. What about the attached patch

Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: I just discussed this with Moritz Mühlenhoff on #debian-security. His request is to leave all genDSA specific stuff in the genD{S,L}A script untouched. What about the attached patch ? It displays a colorful warning and offers to commit only the