Re: Fwd: cacti security update

2014-07-14 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:20:54PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi all, On 5 July, I sent the attached security update to the announce list. It seems to have never reached that list. Could somebody enlighten me and tell me what I did wrong?

Re: Bug#760358: please add [SECURITY] subject prefix for debian-lts-announce

2014-09-03 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Wed, 03 Sep 2014, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, Can you please configure the debian-lts-announce list so it has a subject prefix [SECURITY] , in the same way that debian-security-announce has? Current difference between d-s-a and d-l-a:

Re: Please remove me from the list!

2015-03-10 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Abel Guzman wrote: Good day, Thank you for your answer. I have done the unsubscription procedure using both methods a few times and it does not work for me. I just did it again, so if your receive this message there should be a problem, isnt it? Thats wrong. You can

Re: Archive of squeeze-lts ?

2016-03-24 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Luke Hall wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing this when trying to fetch lts packages from > archive.debian.org at the moment. Anyone know a good contact for them? > > E: Release file expired, ignoring > http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze-lts/Release (invalid > since 9d

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 737-1] roundcube security update

2016-12-09 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 09.12.2016 11:23, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > >> will there also be a fixed wheezy-backports version? It is at 0.9.5. > > > > As this CVE/DLA is still fresh in my mind, I've gone ahead and uploaded a > > 0.9.5-1~bpo70+1.1 to

Re: Extended Long Term Support for Wheezy

2018-02-20 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 20 février 2018 18:10 +0100, Raphael Hertzog  : > > >> some of the LTS sponsors are looking to extend the support period of > >> Debian 7 Wheezy (from a few months up to a full year).i > > > > FWIW, I published a blog post with

Re: Fwd: jessie-backports discontinued

2018-07-27 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > I saw the security support for jessie-backports has been stopped. > > To be honest, I did not realize that there is no LTS security support > for backports, and I do use it! > > Maybe it's an idea to find ways to add backports to the

Re: Fwd: jessie-backports discontinued

2018-07-27 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Op 27-07-18 om 11:35 schreef Alexander Wirt: > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I saw the security support for jessie-backports has been stopped.

Re: Removal of 'arm64' from debian-security repo breaks community projects

2018-08-16 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Lee Jones wrote: > Good morning Debian LTS/Security Team(s), > > It has come to my attention that 'arm64' support was recently removed > from the debian-security repo [1]. After reading your announcement > [2] from June 1st it is clear that this is not a bug, but a

Re: Fwd: [Ticket#2018033089000104] Ticket Created: [SECURITY] [DLA 1332-1] libvncserver security update

2018-03-31 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, Abhijith PA wrote: > Hello. > I received this mail after sending DLA. Is it something set up by our > sponsors ? Or spam. Such autoresponders are not allowed on l.d.o. I unsubscribed the user from all lists. Alex - Debian Listmaster

Re: the way to enigmail: gnupg 2.1 backport considerations

2018-11-12 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > Hi, > > So I've been looking at Enigmail again, after a long journey helping > people in stable getting that stuff fixed. It's pretty obvious there's > no way to upload that without first doing a GnuPG 2.1 backport into > jessie. > > That, it turns

Re: the way to enigmail: gnupg 2.1 backport considerations

2018-11-19 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2018-11-13 22:02:45, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 12:31 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >> On Mon 2018-11-12 15:16:39 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> > >> > * libgcrypt20 (part of GnuTLS, 1.6 -> 1.7) > >> > >> libgcrypt

Re: DLAs not arriving at my mailbox and I think it may be a general issue

2019-02-03 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Sun, 03 Feb 2019, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2019-02-03 22:09:20, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > If someone have an idea on how I may have screwed this up myself I'm happy > > to know. :-) > > After a quick glance, this might be gmail obsessing over DMARC. Typical > problems all mailing lists

Re: DLAs not arriving at my mailbox and I think it may be a general issue

2019-02-03 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Sun, 03 Feb 2019, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi Antoine and Alexander > > Alexander: > So what should we do to prevent this from happening? Don't use gmail or at least tell me what exactly was wrong on the mail. > > Antoine: > Thank you for pointing that out. > > I found this in the BTS: >

Re: DLAs not arriving at my mailbox and I think it may be a general issue

2019-02-03 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Sun, 03 Feb 2019, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > > I can understand the view that gmail, yahoo and others are to blame for the > lost message. It is after all that service that rejected it. I do however > think we need to live with the fact that we may have users that tend to use > such

Re: Backports LTS security support

2019-02-08 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to have LTS support for backports. On most systems I use > one or more packages from backports. > > When the same version of a package is in use in the next version of > Debian, I guess backporting them is -in most cases-

Re: Backports LTS security support

2019-02-08 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Op 08-02-19 om 15:29 schreef Alexander Wirt: > > On Fri, 08 Feb 2019, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I would like to have LTS support for backports. On most systems I use > >>

Re: Bug#921663: Please add python-certbot update to jessie-backports

2019-02-11 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, Brad Warren wrote: > I agree with the concerns about updating python3-cryptography in jessie. > > If we can’t update jessie, I’d ideally love to see the packages in > jessie-backports updated. Despite the announcement that jessie-backports was > discontinued ~6 months ago,

Re: Newer kernel for jessie backports

2019-03-14 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 01:57:37PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, Arthur de Jong wrote: > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > &g

Re: Newer kernel for jessie backports

2019-03-14 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019, Arthur de Jong wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > > Hi, > > In jessie backports there is currently a 4.9 kernel (4.9.110-3+debu5~deb8u1) > which is based on stretch 4.9.110-3+deb9u2. Since stretch now has > 4.9.144-3.1 are there any plans to

Re: jessie-updates gone

2019-03-26 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Jakob Hirsch wrote: > Hi, > > so I noticed this morning that jessie-updates is gone from the mirrors. > After some research, I found that this was kind of announced in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/03/msg6.html. > Question is now, what should I