Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 261-1] aptdaemon security update

2015-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello Pascal, On Sat, 04 Jul 2015, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Just for the record, I got the following error when upgrading python-aptdaemon on an i386 system with python2.5-minimal installed : Thanks for the report, I just uploaded 0.31+bzr413-1.1+deb6u2 fixing this. Don't hesitate to put in

Re: squeeze-pu: package ftpd-ssl/0.17.32+0.3-1+deb6u1

2015-07-06 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
[Keep my address in CC!] Wednesday den 1 July 2015 klockan 21:26 skrev Thorsten Alteholz detta: Hi Mats, On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: The corresponding debdiff is attached. Please inform me how approach this matter. from my point of view it would be great to have

Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 05 Jul 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: I just looked at the patch and played with it a little. Comments: o We maybe want to do an svn update before manipulating data/DLA/list and data/dla-needed.txt file? Probably a minor thing, but it svn updating could be handeled by

Re: bin/genDLA proposal: auto-commit requested DLA numbers (was: Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 265-1] unattended-upgrades security update)

2015-07-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 6. Juli 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote: is anybody working on LTS really using pure svn instead of git-svn? I somewhat doubt it... I am. Most commits need to be pushed immediately anyway, right? well, for LTS probably yes, though I still prefer being able to use git log, git