Re: heads up: DLA should now be published on the website

2019-02-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Antoine, On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:10:47PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > But my little finger tells me there are many DLAs still missing from the > website. So even if/when the above MR does get merged, more entries will > be missing. So someone will need to make sure to run the check script

Re: heads up: DLA should now be published on the website

2019-02-21 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2019-02-21 18:18:06, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:10:47PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> But my little finger tells me there are many DLAs still missing from the >> website. So even if/when the above MR does get merged, more entries will >> be missing. So s

Re: heads up: DLA should now be published on the website

2019-02-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 01:51:07PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > -> this script is incorrect/broken for DLAs it seems, as > > https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ does list the DLAs 1677-1681, > > just DLAs 1682-1685 are missing. And they are called DLA-1234 there, > > not "DLA 1234-1"... > We