Hi again.
I just re-read one ofthe instruction emails and realize that we have
recently extended the scope. Point taken. Will not remove runc.
/ Ola
Den mån 8 apr. 2024 14:51Ola Lundqvist skrev:
> Hi
>
> Yes I read that. But should we keep it in dla needed when it is to update
> a non lts
Hi
Yes I read that. But should we keep it in dla needed when it is to update a
non lts release?
I thought the purpose of dla needed was for lts.
I understand the need to do forward porting but is dla needed the place for
that?
/ Ola
Den mån 8 apr. 2024 13:33Sylvain Beucler skrev:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
Please read the dla-needed.txt entry.
It says we should sync *bullseye*.
Cheers!
Sylvain
On 07/04/2024 23:47, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi fellow LTS contributors
I was about to assign runc to myself but realized that it should not be
in dla-needed.
There is just one CVE to be fixed and that
