Hi,
it's been a while but I still want to comment on this...
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:45:56PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > Antoine, this is an example were automatic unclaim might be problematic,
> > as it would have unclaimed pdns/pdns-recursor which is not ideal. (For
> > now, just ment
On 2018-12-27 14:16:22, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Abhijith, Antoine,
>
> I just ran "./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 1814400 --exclude
> linux linux-4.9" today and it unclaimed pdns/pdns-recursor as the last
> NOTE entries were more than 3 weeks ago. However Abhijith wrote here:
>
> On
Hi Abhijith,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:01:32PM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
> > Abhijith, thanks for this update! Just please also update the notes for
> > these packages in data/dla-needed.txt.
> I will.
Thank you.
> >> time in it as it is not so popular one and it has no-DSA postponed
> >>
Hi, Holger..
On Thursday 27 December 2018 07:46 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Abhijith, Antoine,
>
> I just ran "./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 1814400 --exclude
> linux linux-4.9" today and it unclaimed pdns/pdns-recursor as the last
> NOTE entries were more than 3 weeks ago.
Hi Abhijith, Antoine,
I just ran "./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 1814400 --exclude
linux linux-4.9" today and it unclaimed pdns/pdns-recursor as the last
NOTE entries were more than 3 weeks ago. However Abhijith wrote here:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 01:02:06PM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
