On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:28:36PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
The linker actually cares about the library interface, not the library
version.
If you remove or change interface, Debian will have to rev the library
version (e.g. from libstaden-read.so.1 to libstaden-read.so.2),
regardless of
Hello,
in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat
unusual
post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the users
that
upstream needs funding to maintain their software.
The respective preliminary code I have just checked in. Upstream had
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely considered
user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not ready for upstream
in its current state.
Hi, thank you for the comment.
I will stop to
In 20090728163525.gc31...@an3as.eu, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely
considered user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not
ready for upstream in its current state.
In 200907281303.42301@iguanasuicide.net, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090728163525.gc31...@an3as.eu, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely
considered user-friendly. However,
5 matches
Mail list logo
