Re: 10,000 commits !

2012-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:06:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Author: plessy Date: 2012-03-15 03:59:48 + (Thu, 15 Mar 2012) New Revision: 1 Hi all, I just realised that our Subversion repository passed its 10,000th commit ! Cool. We might start betting about when we will

Re: About non-free license for non-copyrightable work.

2012-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:52:18AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Because data it not copyrightable, I would like to keep on using and distributing the protein sequence files from the UniProt consortium that I found in the emboss and bioperl packages, disreagarding their license, CC

Re: ITP: pesco -- Cognitive stimulation tool for elderly or cognitively impaired

2012-03-15 Thread Luis Rivas
2012/3/14 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu: Sure - just commit to git and we will check and sponsor it. Great! Additional remark:  This is obviosely not the usual ITP template.  When issuing ITP bugs you should use    reportbug wnpp I did, but I didn't CC debian med list. Just share your

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] would like some help getting started

2012-03-15 Thread Olivier Sallou
Le 3/15/12 8:49 AM, Mike Dupont a écrit : Hi there, I pulled the packaging from svn, svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm http://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm dpkg-buildpackage is failing for the packages, and also the

Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, for the sake of interest I did a Google search for free bioinformatics software and it seems we are not really relevant because under 2.740.000 results we are not amongst the first 30 hits. Even whan adding Linux as additional term the 2.170.000 results do not contain a direct link to

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
yeah... I guess http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/ must be adjusted. What about extending The goal of Debian Med is a complete system for all tasks in medical care which is built completely on free software. The goal of Debian Med is a complete free and open system for all tasks in

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Steffen Möller
Agreed. And then there is this ever-lasting issue about the uncertainty what our home page should be. Personally, I do not mind to leave much of the direct user interaction with BioLinux, much like Ubuntu taking a lot from us. I am more concerned about the synchronicity of our packaging. So, once

LinkedIn account on Hold Ref24192164

2012-03-15 Thread HU 77337930 I
RefΟ96-4396810-72070382-8-267 !--OV 72032242 X http://goo.gl/Vh7rT RT 46738318 N -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Agreed. And then there is this ever-lasting issue about the uncertainty what our home page should be. yeah -- I always just google debian-med and choose one which fits me best IMHO ideally it should be something easy to remember e.g. med.debian.net ? ;) --

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Steffen Möller
On 03/15/2012 02:36 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Agreed. And then there is this ever-lasting issue about the uncertainty what our home page should be. yeah -- I always just google debian-med and choose one which fits me best :) I just use (some of) the packages ... IMHO ideally it should

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
IMHO ideally it should be something easy to remember e.g. med.debian.net ? ;) And bio.debian.net as an alias :) Just kidding. Somewhat. I would support your suggestion. ;-) My hunch is that we need an exchange about the practical side of the packages more to educate our users and

Re: Small error in the Debian Med Group Policy

2012-03-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:51:46PM -0400, Laurent Parenteau a écrit : The instructions mentioned are : ... debcheckout --user username ssh:// svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/package/trunk package ... For read-only access, remove the --user option. ... But that is not enough.

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Steffen Möller
On 03/15/2012 03:09 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: IMHO ideally it should be something easy to remember e.g. med.debian.net ? ;) And bio.debian.net as an alias :) Just kidding. Somewhat. I would support your suggestion. ;-) My hunch is that we need an exchange about the practical side

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
in neuroimaging field we have a portal http://www.nitrc.org/ which is used by many projects to host/distribute their code/data/etc. So neuro.debian.net package pages (e.g. http://neuro.debian.net/pkgs/ants.html ) backlink to blends pages and NITRC pages. also on NITRC side we have

Re: [MoM] Summary of first mentoring period

2012-03-15 Thread Scott Christley
Hi Andreas, Oh sorry, I thought I posted my results but apparently not! The upgrade was a no go, everything download and installed okay but upon reboot the machine froze. If I get a chance then I will try to install the testing distribution. In the meantime, I've been working with upstream

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
another way to promote Debian-Med would be to point people to it when appropriate, e.g. consider http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2994109/what-do-you-think-is-the-best-language-for-bioinformatics so -- share your view (Perl? Python?), point to Debian-Med task page as the source where to get it

Re: [MoM] Summary of first mentoring period

2012-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Scott, [Hint: there is no need to CC me when posting to the list] On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:22:27AM -0500, Scott Christley wrote: The upgrade was a no go, everything download and installed okay but upon reboot the machine froze. Hmmm, does not sound good. But you seem to have tried

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:52:42AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: The goal of Debian Med is a complete free and open system for all tasks in medical care and research. To achieve this goal Debian Med integrates related free and open source software for medical imaging, bioinformatics,

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: Agreed. And then there is this ever-lasting issue about the uncertainty what our home page should be. IMHO the reason for success of Debian Med is the fact that it is perfectly integrated inside Debian. To stress this fact I

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
maintaining it?... what I had in mind is just a short/memorable entry point for debian-med project. From there it could point/redirect/frame/whatever you like to the 'home page' of the debian med project... which is which (I guess the first one but not 100% sure ;) )

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Eric MAEKER
Le 15 mars 2012 à 15:09, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit : IMHO ideally it should be something easy to remember e.g. med.debian.net ? ;) And bio.debian.net as an alias :) Just kidding. Somewhat. I would support your suggestion. ;-) My hunch is that we need an exchange about the

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Eric MAEKER
Le 15 mars 2012 à 19:57, Andreas Tille a écrit : On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:52:42AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: The goal of Debian Med is a complete free and open system for all tasks in medical care and research. To achieve this goal Debian Med integrates related free and open

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Eric MAEKER
Le 15 mars 2012 à 20:26, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit : http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/ http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/ http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed Yes there are too many websites. I'm lost between all these. Do we really have to keep them all ? Can't we make a unique one

Re: ITP: pesco -- Cognitive stimulation tool for elderly or cognitively impaired

2012-03-15 Thread Eric MAEKER
Le 14 mars 2012 à 09:34, Luis Rivas a écrit : Hi! I'd like you to know that I'm working on packaging Pesco, a cognitive stimulation tool, and I would like to propose it for Debian Med. I think Pesco can fit in the rehabilitation task, and if you find it of interest for Debian Med I can

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
minor comment -- I believe we would not be able to get med.debian.org but any DD could easily register any domain at debian.net, e.g. med.debian.net Can't we make a unique one easily editable (like wiki) ? with redirects like: http://med.debian.org/ -

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:53:47PM +0100, Eric MAEKER a écrit : Le 15 mars 2012 à 20:26, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit : http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/ http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/ http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed Yes there are too many websites. I'm lost between all

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:57:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : meta name=keywords content=... Hmmm, I have no idea how to tweak this into WML - Charles, any idea or do we need to ask debian-www team? Hi Andreas, I searched through the source of the whole Debian website, and did not

Re: Are we relevant under terms of free bioinformatics software

2012-03-15 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
yeah -- most probably it is the case indeed that they are useless... thanks for the wikilink e.g. for neurodebian we have 'debian neuroscience' keywords and google returns neurodebian only 4th (first one is http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/neuroscience-cognitive ;-)) so my guess that