Hi,
when I was dealing with a watch file of a BioConductor package it turned
out by accident that I prepared it for development releases. Thanks to
Charles this was fixed and we are now tracking stable releases. Today I
stumbled upon r-bioc-cummerbund which in the watchfile explicitly stated
to
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:32:11AM -0400, Carlos Borroto wrote:
I agree on following stable releases as a general rule. The reason I
chose to use development version of cummeRbund was because at the time
upstream was recommending it. The package was on heavy development and
stable releases
Le Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:11:15AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
I will wait a bit for other comments, and then re-contact UniProt as Ian
suggested.
Dear all,
I re-contacted UniProt, and they proposed to add a clarification on their
license page, in line with what I proposed, that a couple
3 matches
Mail list logo
