Re: [Debichem-devel] Where to maintain pdb2pqr

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:53:44PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote: Yes, I guess keeping the history as is is probably best. My impression was that Debian Med and DebiChem work together quite well due to some overlap of developers. So IMHO it's not important where the repo lives. My impression might

Re: Plans for ITK version 4

I'm quoting the entire old thread below since it's been a while, but I have a solution now unless the release team rejects it. Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote: there seems to be a new build-depends complication: libgeotiff-dev depends on libtiff5-dev, libtiff5-dev

Re: Plans for ITK version 4

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:48:19AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: I'm quoting the entire old thread below since it's been a while, but I have a solution now unless the release team rejects it. Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote: there seems to be a new build-depends

Help on version numbering

Hi, I need some help. If I release a 0.7.2-2 version with a source tarball numbered 0.7.2-2. How should I write the changelog numbering ? 0.7.2-2-1 ? 0.7.2-2.1 ? Thanks for your help - Eric Maeker, MD (Fr) http://www.freemedforms.com : Suite logicielle médicale open source

Re: pdb2pqr

Hi Olivier! On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:00:05AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: I tried to get pdb2pqr to build and upload it. However, new version does not build at all (failure at install time). I think I will need Manuel help to get the package ready. I'll have a look into it.

Re: sponsor upload aghermann-0.5.90-2 please

The fix is trivial and straightforward, yet I'm somewhat apprehensive of any trivial mistakes I may make in the process of preparing the patch. Please be the kind and patient upload sponsor you have always been :} ;-) built and uploaded to Debian sid and NeuroDebian (e.g. for 12.04 ubuntu)