Hi Peter,
thanks for the short update about Oscar development.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 08:26:45AM -0400, Peter Hutten-Czapski wrote:
...
For now I release things that look like debs at sourceforge.
(apologies to any conventions slurred in the process)
Hi All,
Could you please suggest what is better in the following case:
2 weeks ago I imported the new upstream (2.0.0-beta7) version of bowtie2
to the repository, but than I decided to revert back to the old commit.
Here is the discussion why I decided so [0].
After all I used push --force to
Hi All,
I just imported the new upstream version for bowtie2 and now lintian
gives me the following warning:
N: Processing binary package bowtie2 (version 2.0.0-beta7-1, arch i386) ...
W: bowtie2: rc-version-greater-than-expected-version 2.0.0-beta7 2.0.0
(consider using 2.0.0~beta7)
In
Thank you for your kind words and encouragement
Our source is in GIT and we reveal the source of our trunk stable (not
really but not badly unstable) and releases on Sourceforge
(we use a different repository for submission and vetting of code)
I have not packaged the source, and would have to
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:49:36PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
I just imported the new upstream version for bowtie2 and now lintian
gives me the following warning:
N: Processing binary package bowtie2 (version 2.0.0-beta7-1, arch i386) ...
W: bowtie2:
Hi,
I plan to package soapdenovo, hwich is in DebianMed tasks.
I have seen some previous mail exchanges by Andreas in Fed 2011 [0].
As license is GPL 3+ now, is there anything that prevented packaging ?
Or should I simply go with an ITP?
[0]
On 07/30/2012 04:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:49:36PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
I just imported the new upstream version for bowtie2 and now lintian
gives me the following warning:
N: Processing binary package bowtie2 (version 2.0.0-beta7-1, arch i386) ...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org
Date: 2012/7/30
Subject: Bug#683291: Acknowledgement (ITP: soapdenovo -- short-read
assembly method that can build a de novo draft assembly for the human-sized
genomes)
To: Olivier Sallou
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:09:22AM -0400, Peter Hutten-Czapski wrote:
Thank you for your kind words and encouragement
No specific thanks for this is needed - we try to entertain a warm and
welcoming voice here in the Debian Med team. :-)
Our source is in GIT and we reveal the source
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 05:08:36PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
$ dpkg --compare-versions 2.0.0-beta6-1 gt 1:2.0.0 echo $?
this depend on the way upstream will call the non-beta version.
In case of version clash it is fine for me to start use epochs.
But what to do if I want to
Hi Olivier,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:23:25PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
I have seen some previous mail exchanges by Andreas in Fed 2011 [0].
As license is GPL 3+ now, is there anything that prevented packaging ?
Or should I simply go with an ITP?
Sure - just go on.
Kind regards
Hi again,
after sending this mail I just noticed that you just took action even
before - that's great! One thing I would like to see if you could find
some publication data and inject these in debian/upstream file.
Thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at
I confess that I build debs manually by just compressing a file structure
Peter Hutten-Czapski
Haileybury Ontario
The attitude that ‘if rural people want these services they’ll have
to come to the city to get them’ is simply not acceptable…” (Newbery,
1999)
Before printing,
Hi Luca, Yaroslav,
Thanks for the bunch of pertinent remarks. I really learned a thing or two
about Debian process as I went through them one by one. Here's hoping the way
I dealt with them is satisfactory. For details, you can check the current
state in... oops... For some reason, even after
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:49:36PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
N: Processing binary package bowtie2 (version 2.0.0-beta7-1, arch i386) ...
W: bowtie2: rc-version-greater-than-expected-version 2.0.0-beta7 2.0.0
(consider using 2.0.0~beta7)
Le Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:17:14PM +0200,
1.
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, andrei zavada wrote:
state in... oops... For some reason, even after I did as instructed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git#Repository_maintenance, this URL
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/hmmr-guest/cnrun.git points to
nowhere, and
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:47:11PM -0400, Peter Hutten-Czapski wrote:
I confess that I build debs manually by just compressing a file structure
I really wished that the descriptions to do it that way would vanish
from the internet for good. :-(
These are always tricking beginners who for some
17 matches
Mail list logo
