C++ help needed for Tide

Hi, I have started packaging Tide (a tandard tool for ass-spectroscopy) at git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/tide.git Unfortunately these days gcc is more picky about C++ syntax and I was running into g++ -ggdb -O6 -DNDEBUG -I./protoobj -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat

Re: C++ help needed for Tide

Hi, > g++ -ggdb -O6 -DNDEBUG -I./protoobj -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -o obj-opt-x86_64/test_spectrum_preprocess.o -c > src/test_spectrum_preprocess.cc > In file included from src/test_spectrum_preprocess.cc:8:0: > src/records.h: In destructor

Packaging pipasic and its dependencies (InsPecT / Tide)

Hi Martin and Anke, (I'm writing by wearing my Debian maintainer hut but we can talk about this also via internal phone - I just want to get Filippo involved since he might have a good overview abou this topic.) I have created Debian packaging code for pipasic[1] which creates a working Debian

Re: ITP: sleepyhead -- Software for sleep tracking with focus on CPAP treatment

Hi Sergio, On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:12:23PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > A quick look at Blends tells me that maybe this software could fit in > the 'Medical data' task (because its purpose is to analyse the data > generated by CPAP machines), although 'Tools' is a good option as

Re: Sponsorship request: snap-aligner

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:03 PM Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:42:27AM +, Michael Crusoe a écrit : > > gbp clone git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/snap-aligner.git > > Hi Michael, > > I found non-Free statements in some files under

Re: Sponsorship request: snap-aligner

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:02:10AM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > > Thank you for catching that. They are not used to build, so I've stripped > them out using Files-excluded in debian/copyright. > > Alas, I just discovered that tests/bin/ValidateSamFile.jar doesn't contain > its source code and

Re: Sponsorship request: snap-aligner

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:11 PM Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:06:31AM +, Michael Crusoe a écrit : > > transrate-tools is also ready > > > > gbp clone git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/transrate-tools.git > > Hi Michael, > > I think that your

source-is-missing lintian error in orthanc

Dear all, While upgrading the orthanc package to the newest upstream version (0.9.4), I notice that Lintian reports new "source-is-missing" errors: == N: Processing source package orthanc (version 0.9.4+dfsg-1, arch source) ... E: orthanc source: source-is-missing

Processed: retitle 778589 to ITP: berkeley-express -- Streaming quantification for high-throughput sequencing

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 778589 ITP: berkeley-express -- Streaming quantification for > high-throughput sequencing Bug #778589 {Done: cru...@ucdavis.edu (Michael R. Crusoe)} [wnpp] "ITP: berkeley-express -- Streaming quantification for high Changed Bug title to

Re: source-is-missing lintian error in orthanc

> > So, the files that are reported to be missing are actually present in the > > source package. > > ... and this is the problem. Lintian considers these files not as > source package since these are minimized (or lintian considers these as > minimized). You always need to provide

Re: Maintenance of freeimage over to d-science

Hi Anton, I'll be on leave for the next week and can't commit to get this patch out soon. Feel free to do it or let the QA team handle it. I will make sure to re-sync the packaging repository with theirs when I get back. Cheers, Ghislain On 27/09/15 20:37, Anton Gladky wrote: Hi Ghislain,

Re: source-is-missing lintian error in orthanc

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:40:13AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > > Having a look at my personal Lintian reports [1], I then notice that these > errors are also reported to be present on the version 0.9.3. But, I am sure > that these errors were not reported back in early August 2015 when

Re: source-is-missing lintian error in orthanc

Hi, On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:25:49AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > > > So, the files that are reported to be missing are actually present in the > > > source package. > > > > ... and this is the problem. Lintian considers these files not as > > source package since these are minimized (or

Orthanc 0.9.4

Hello Andreas, Thanks to your answers about lintian, I think that Orthanc 0.9.4 is now ready for upload [1]. Regards, Sébastien- [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/

Re: Proper package relationships when a project depends on CBLAS

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:46:51AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Then the binary package gets the following dependency: > Depends: libblas.so.3 just in case: leaving out ${shlibs:Depends} here, you will have to take care of *all* dependencies manually. in more complex cases you may wish to

Re: Proper package relationships when a project depends on CBLAS

On 29/09/15 18:09, Felix Salfelder wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:49:50PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: what is wrong with a builddep on libopenblas-dev|someotherblas-dev? do you want to discard the second option in case the first is available (don't know how to do that)? If I use say

Re: update: automatic backports

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:19:54AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > ... > So it looks like I can link something from these approaches to the > testing migration tracking. Right now, the tracking is implemented as > watching and parsing the emails. Thanks for the update. Just let us know if there

Re: Maintenance of freeimage over to d-science

OK, so should I commit to QA repo or debian-science. Anton Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015 schrieb Ghislain Vaillant : > Hi Anton, > > I'll be on leave for the next week and can't commit to get this patch out > soon. Feel free to do it or let the QA team handle it. I will make sure to > re-sync

update: automatic backports

Hi, all, Continuing from the previous discussions [1-2], I have just a little bit to report (though I have not worked on it very much since then, unfortunately) My repository is now published at http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/afif-guest/backportd.git/ I appreciate the neurodebian people

Bug#800335: cereal: source package name conflicts

Oops, I thought I had renamed the source package to libcereal. What's the best way to correct this situation? The package is already in the NEW queue: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/cereal_1.1.2-1.html