Re: transitions and binnmu

2015-12-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gert, On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:01:48PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > now that I took some more responsibility, i.e. also for gdcm and dcmtk > I'm wondering about one detail: with the changed SO-versions of these > packages should I request BinNMUs or is this done automatically. For > example I

Re: transitions and binnmu

2015-12-19 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:01:48PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > Any pointers how to proceed? - Because there is quite a list of > packages that could transit to testing if the dependencies on old > versions of dcmtk and gdcm could be cleared. Yay ! That's a large part of the 700-odd packages bein

transitions and binnmu

2015-12-19 Thread Gert Wollny
Hi all, now that I took some more responsibility, i.e. also for gdcm and dcmtk I'm wondering about one detail: with the changed SO-versions of these packages should I request BinNMUs or is this done automatically. For example I see a auto-dcmtk transition but not auto-gdcm. I've read the docume

Bug#777688: marked as done (ITP: khmer -- in-memory DNA sequence kmer counting, filtering & graph traversal)

2015-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:00:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#777688: fixed in khmer 2.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #777688, regarding ITP: khmer -- in-memory DNA sequence kmer counting, filtering & graph traversal to be marked as done. This means that you