Re: Request for increased awareness: Open Source FPGA acceleration

2016-09-02 Thread Matus Kalas
Sounds really epic! I'm looking forward to check it out properly. Long live FPGAs! (Btw, aren't there any interesting news also about NoCs?) Matus On 2016-09-02 10:18, Steffen Möller wrote: Hi all, Those who participated in our past Sprint in Lyngby have met Ruben. He is the one who kindly

Re: Upgrading kissplice (Was: [med-svn] r22737 - trunk/packages/kissplice/trunk/debian)

2016-09-02 Thread David Parsons
Hi Andreas, Thank you for the swift answer and for your remarks. I will get to the upstream team to handle this python 2/3 issue and I'll look into autopkgtest next time. I also duly noted the use of cme fix dpkg-control I think in the end I will use a plain sid for packaging purposes

Upgrading kissplice (Was: [med-svn] r22737 - trunk/packages/kissplice/trunk/debian)

2016-09-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi David, On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:19:14PM +0200, David Parsons wrote: > I've just bumped kissplice to the latest version. Thanks for the update. > It's been a long time since I last did any packaging so I may have forgotten > some stuff, please feel free to yell at me ;-) Well, I interpret

Request for increased awareness: Open Source FPGA acceleration

2016-09-02 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi all, Those who participated in our past Sprint in Lyngby have met Ruben. He is the one who kindly packaged all that needed to be packaged for the first and yet only completely Open Source toolchain for FPGA computing. Details are on http://wiki.debian.org/FPGA/Lattice . Ruben started that

Re: otb is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-09-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:32:07AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > I sent one to Andreas (via email, cc'd) on the 25th when the bug was > originally submitted. I had commited it to SVN at this time. > It appears he has yet to submit a new release of the package. I can > prepare it if time

Re: otb is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-09-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:28AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Debian Med, can someone fix the libminc RC bug regardless, I submitted a > patch for it recently because the same issue affected netcdf & pdal. > ismrmrd (#835679) has the same issue, and I've submitted a patch for it too.

Re: otb is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-09-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 02/09/16 07:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 09/02/2016 06:39 AM, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: otb 5.6.1+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-08 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 835400: libminc: FTBFS: convert.c:13:18: fatal error: hdf5.h:

Re: Fix autopkgtest for fastqc

2016-09-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:03:49AM +0200, Dylan wrote: > I also pushed my change which should fix the test. Could someone > upload it to unstable? I'll do. Thanks for the fix, Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: [outreachy] [profphd] Fwd: on Debian "profphd' upstream ChangeLog's entry

2016-09-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Tanya, On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:21:24PM +0300, merlettaia wrote: > I've committed recent changes in profphd package. The work still in > progress, OK, so I will not upload yet. > I fixed patch because of following reason: $tmplen which is not initialized > might be undefined, and this

Re: otb is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-09-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/02/2016 06:39 AM, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: > otb 5.6.1+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-08 > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > 835400: libminc: FTBFS: convert.c:13:18: fatal error: hdf5.h: No such file or > directory This makes