Re: [Help] Failed to upgrade bcftools to version 1.5

2017-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 28 July 2017 at 16:30, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > Once I'm at it I can also take a shot at bcftools. Never worked on that > > before though, let's see how it goes. > > Please take note you'll need

CI for trimmomatic

2017-07-28 Thread Nadiya Sitdykova
Hello Andreas, test-suite for trimmomatic package is ready. Regards, Nadiya

Re: CI for ray

2017-07-28 Thread Nadiya Sitdykova
Hello all, Graham, thank you for your advice and those examples. It really makes sense to get rid of ssh dependency for a whole package, since it could be used on the same host. Andreas, I removed ssh from dependencies and added mention by Graham line to the run-unit-test. Regards, Nadiya On

Re: [Help] Failed to upgrade bcftools to version 1.5

2017-07-28 Thread Graham Inggs
On 28 July 2017 at 16:30, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Once I'm at it I can also take a shot at bcftools. Never worked on that > before though, let's see how it goes. Please take note you'll need to backtract in git until version 1.4.1-2, add the patches, and upload 1.4.1-3. I

Re: [Help] Failed to upgrade bcftools to version 1.5

2017-07-28 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi all, [...] >> The remaining bugs blocking the transition are augustus (bug #869126) and >> bcftools (bug #868958). Sascha has already pushed the augustus changes to >> git, and it just needs an upload. The two fixes for bcftools are in the bug >> report, someone should review them and

Re: [Help] Failed to upgrade bcftools to version 1.5

2017-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:23:40PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 25/07/2017 11:20, Andreas Tille wrote: > > So how will we deal with #865006 and issues in python-pysam? > > I made a few minor changes to python-pysam 0.11.2.2 (which builds against > bcftools 1.4.1) as it stands in

Re: [Help] Failed to upgrade bcftools to version 1.5

2017-07-28 Thread Graham Inggs
On 25/07/2017 11:20, Andreas Tille wrote: So how will we deal with #865006 and issues in python-pysam? I made a few minor changes to python-pysam 0.11.2.2 (which builds against bcftools 1.4.1) as it stands in git, and managed to get it to build and pass its tests. If there are no

Bug#869969: ITP: gfapy -- flexible and extensible software library for handling sequence graphs

2017-07-28 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sascha Steinbiss * Package name: gfapy Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Giorgio Gonnella * URL : https://github.com/ggonnella/gfapy * License : ISC Programming Lang: Python Description :

Re: CI for ray

2017-07-28 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Nadiya On 28 July 2017 at 05:35, Nadiya Sitdykova wrote: > -- > The value of the MCA parameter "plm_rsh_agent" was set to a path > that could not be found: > > plm_rsh_agent: ssh : rsh > > Please