Re: please upload new imagej version

2017-09-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Carnë, On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 07:15:38PM +0100, Carnë Draug wrote: > Could you please make a new release of the imagej package? I have > updated to the new upstream release, dropped all the patches that > upstream has now applied, and fixed a new bug that prevents updating > in testing. Shou

Re: please upload new imagej version

2017-09-26 Thread Roger Leigh
On 26/09/17 19:15, Carnë Draug wrote: Could you please make a new release of the imagej package? I have updated to the new upstream release, dropped all the patches that upstream has now applied, and fixed a new bug that prevents updating in testing. Should only need to be built, git tagged, an

please upload new imagej version

2017-09-26 Thread Carnë Draug
Hi Could you please make a new release of the imagej package? I have updated to the new upstream release, dropped all the patches that upstream has now applied, and fixed a new bug that prevents updating in testing. Should only need to be built, git tagged, and uploaded. One thing I was unsure

Re: Concerns about OMICTOOLS terms of service..

2017-09-26 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Jon, hi Charles, On 26.09.17 09:31, Jon Ison wrote: > Dear Charles & fellow Debianoids, > > Forgive the blatant sales pitch, but you’re very welcome to the bio.tools > data (all of it) which is licensed > (http://biotools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/license.html) under Creative > Commons Attri

RE: Concerns about OMICTOOLS terms of service..

2017-09-26 Thread Jon Ison
Dear Charles & fellow Debianoids, Forgive the blatant sales pitch, but you’re very welcome to the bio.tools data (all of it) which is licensed (http://biotools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/license.html) under Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0), which I hope suits your purposes (pleas

Re: task pages: Moved many NGS packages from bio to bio-ngs

2017-09-26 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:02:18PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > On 25.09.17 19:50, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> Our task page https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/bio lists a few > >> packages with a "??? missing short description" - Abacas for instance. > > As I tried to say: Something in the UD

Concerns about OMICTOOLS terms of service..

2017-09-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Hello everybody, it is really great to provide references to metadata repositories that help describing the software that we distribute. However, I have looked at the terms of use of OMICtools and I have serious concerns: https://omictools.com/terms-of-use On one hand, the data seems to be Free